Heavy investment in China by Taiwanese businesspeople will have many negative effects on Taiwan in the long run. I will limit my discussion to just two.
First, large amounts of investment in China by Taiwanese means that less money is invested in Taiwan, and this slows down the rate of domestic industrial upgrade. Since the majority of Taiwanese businesspeople can use their existing technologies to manufacture products in China, they have no need to conduct research and development or to invest in Taiwan, nor do they face any immediate pressure to improve the quality of their business operations, which means industrial upgrades here have slowed and will continue to do so.
The second problem is the risk that Taiwan’s exports will be replaced by Chinese exports. When Taiwanese invest in China they strengthen the competitiveness of Chinese products on the international market, and this poses a huge threat to Taiwan’s export sector. This began happening a long time ago and the way in which Taiwan is being disadvantaged and China is benefiting from this situation is already very clear.
Studies by the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research show that in 2004, the export replacement percentage for products made by Taiwan’s manufacturing sector that were replaced by Chinese products in the US and Japanese markets was 13.21 percent and 8.49 percent respectively. Taiwanese technology-intensive products were the item most frequently replaced by Chinese products.
In the US market in 2004, 19.26 percent of Taiwan’s exports of technology-intensive products were replaced by Chinese products, while 8.56 percent and 7.33 percent of less and moderately technology-intensive products were replaced by Chinese products.
In the Japanese market in 2003, 13.22 percent of technology-intensive Taiwanese products were replaced by Chinese products, while 7.35 percent and 10.87 percent of Taiwanese less and moderately technology-intensive products were replaced by Chinese products.
It is worth noting that the Taiwanese-made items most frequently replaced by Chinese products in the US and Japanese markets were the moderately and technology-intensive products, and that the export replacement percentage has been continuously increasing since 2000.
It is now obvious that the substitution effect has started to overtake the complementarity and mutual benefit that is supposed to exist as a result of division of labor in trade conducted between Taiwan and China.
Taiwan’s trade with China so far has seen Taiwanese invest huge amounts in China, which has caused a decrease in investment in Taiwan and had a severe impact on our economy.
If President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government ignores the trade issues I have mentioned and signs an economic cooperation framework agreement with China, Taiwan will become increasingly isolated as it is Sinicized, and we will face economic and financial crises that will be very hard to fix.
Wang To-far is a professor of economics at National Taipei University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS