The Copenhagen climate summit had people focused on a range of issues, at least for thetime being. Global warming, energy conservation and the reduction of carbon emissions are being debated throughout the world. Public debates such as this, however, are often nothing more than opportunities for people to demonstrate how concerned they are and then to come out with some frivolous critiques or recommendations. The fact is that the vast majority of people don’t comprehend the ecological issues involved, or if they do, it is at best a rather superficial understanding.
Many countries in the world follow a farmer’s almanac. People in Taiwan use this to tell them not only which days they should carry out certain actions, but also dates important for agriculture, such as the correct time to plant and harvest crops. The ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius wrote: “If the agricultural seasons are followed, there will be more than enough food to go around.”
There is a lot of ecological wisdom in this.
In his “Governing the Nation: a Weekly Journal” on Dec. 12th, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) warned if we do not do more to save energy and cut carbon emissions, we will have to rewrite the farmer’s almanac. This is a definite possibility. Rewriting the calendar is, however, a “mission impossible” for ecologists.
Different organisms require different “effective thermal summation” to complete their development or flower properly. People count their lifespans in years and it is difficult to see the impact of climate change on the human population in a few short years. Many insects, on the other hand, measure their lifespans in days, and their growth and development is significantly impacted by changes in temperature. Warming may well result in an earlier appearance of agricultural pests and dengue-fever-bearing mosquitoes. We could also see an exponential increase in their numbers.
During an economic recession it is natural for us to try to conserve energy and reduce waste. Waste is still all too common, however, and one of the biggest offenders in Taiwan is the government. Laws may be effective in combating corruption, but they do little to stop waste. The major universities also play their part, with their penchant for holding seminars. These seminars are black holes for the public purse. All the money goes into PR and entertainment, and all they achieve is to come up with the same tired conclusions.
In 1998, the German artist Thomas Jacobi held an exhibition at the German Cultural Center in Taipei. In this exhibition was a painting entitled Landscape of Wealth: the Passion and the Fortune, a reflection on the situation in Taiwan. The painting depicted a Taiwanese farmer, wearing a straw hat, ostensibly looking at a chart of stock prices, but actually looking at a parched paddy field. What a shame that more people don’t seem to be concerned about superficiality and waste.
So many ecological problems today are a direct result of the global population explosion and the subsequent exploitation and waste of natural resources. Fishermen in poverty stricken areas around the world make a living by dynamite fishing, using explosives to kill or stun fish. Fishing companies in affluent countries use advanced fishing equipment and mass fishing techniques, chasing vast commercial profits. The developing and developed countries at the climate summit were vying with each other, closing ranks along the lines of who created the problems and who has what vested interest.
The ecological issue at stake has many aspects to it. In addition to the scientific element, there are political, economic, educational and legal considerations. Very few of the politicians engaged in this process have an ecological background and they are unlikely to know the right answers to the problems. This makes the prospect of a future ecological catastrophe likely.
Our current ecological knowledge does not equip us adequately for the problems we face in this regard, and I believe just saying we need to save energy and reduce carbon emissions is not enough. We need to change people’s attitude toward ecology and call for everyone to be more frugal.
Chi Hsin is a professor in the laboratory of theoretical and applied ecology at National Chung Hsing University’s Department of Entomology.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers