The Dec. 5 mayoral and county commissioner elections were a fight for local government leadership. However, because of the central government’s poor performance, many also viewed the elections as a confidence vote for President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration. In the elections, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) secured 12 seats, but KMT Yilan County Commissioner Lu Guo-hwa (呂國華) was defeated by 20,925 votes despite Ma’s 11 visits to Yilan before the election. If not for the government’s poor performance, the KMT would have won this seat easily.
Seven KMT mayors and commissioners were running for re-election. Most KMT mayors and commissioners were easily re-elected, partly because they were incumbents, and partly because the KMT has a tight grip on local politics. The remaining seven cities and counties already ruled by the KMT included two outlying island groups — Kinmen and Lienchiang counties — and Hualien and Taitung counties on the east coast. Traditionally, these have been the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) weakest areas.
The real battleground, then, was Hsinchu City and County and Taoyuan County. In these areas, the DPP’s candidates were chosen without adequate planning.
Four years ago, the KMT candidate for Taoyuan County, Eric Chu (朱立倫), easily defeated the DPP candidate, Cheng Pao-ching (鄭寶清). When the DPP nominated former Government Information Office minister Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) in October, he was expected to suffer a more miserable defeat against the KMT’s candidate, Legislator John Wu (吳志揚), who is from a powerful local political family. Surprisingly however, Wu, the son of former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄), only won the election by about 50,000 votes, an embarrassment to the Wu family.
Chiayi Mayor and Vice KMT Chairwoman Huang Min-hui (黃敏惠), who Ma relies on heavily, only defeated DPP legislator-at-large Twu Shiing-jer (涂醒哲), who had no election experience, by just a little over 8,000 votes. In Penghu County, where the KMT has always won, the two parties had a very close battle, and the KMT’s Wang Chien-fa (王乾發) in the end managed the slimmest of victories with less than 600 votes. Even more surprising, the DPP’s Liu Ti-hao (劉櫂豪) received 38.23 percent of the total vote when running for Taitung commissioner four years ago, but this time that figure increased sharply to 47.41 percent.
The election results can be seen as a warning to the KMT. Although the party suffered serious internal splits in several districts such as Hsinchu, Hualien and Kinmen counties, they were not the main cause of the party’s declining vote. The president’s unclear role, ineffective leadership, self-imposed isolation, opaque operations, overlapping decisions, ignorance of public opinion and loose government units are all big problems.
Unexpectedly, Ma appointed former Taipei deputy mayor King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) as KMT secretary-general to further tighten control of the party. Despite the fact that King is good at strategy and propaganda, this will be ineffective without substantial political accomplishments.
King’s appointment also makes us wonder whether Ma will use reform as an excuse to centralize power. That being so, his decision-making body will become smaller and include people of similar backgrounds.
How then can they possibly understand grassroots thinking?
Hawang Shiow-duan is a professor of political science at Soochow University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS