The Dec. 5 elections for city mayors and county commissioners, city and county councilors, and township chiefs was the first nationwide vote since last year’s presidential election, and, because the populous cities and counties of Taipei, Taichung, Tainan and Kaohsiung were not included, it could also be called the first nationwide “non-urban” elections to be held in Taiwan since it became democratic. This battle at the polls also marked the emergence of the opposition Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) from the shadow of the corruption trial of former president and DPP chairman Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) took office a year and a half ago, his administration’s poor political performance has led to low satisfaction and confidence ratings among the public. This dissatisfaction can be seen if we compare the result of last year’s presidential election with that of the mayor and county commissioner polls on Dec. 5. Counting only the areas where a vote was held this time, the KMT won 3.1 million votes in the presidential election, while the DPP garnered 2.02 million — a difference of 1.08 million. In the Dec. 5 elections for mayors and county commissioners, the KMT’s vote shrank dramatically to 2.18 million — including Hualien County, where the winning independent candidate was expelled from the KMT for running in the election against the party’s wishes.
Speaking just after the election, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said: “We will continue to reform and reflect ... We will take the most humble approach in welcoming this result. Especially, our having regained control of Yilan County is of great significance because it shows that the DPP is gradually regaining the trust of the public ... However, it is only a small step, and we cannot be complacent.”
The DPP should view the poll result rationally and pragmatically and get ready for the next elections. These three-in-one elections covered 17 cities and counties with a total population of more than 9 million, about 40 percent of Taiwan’s whole population. Toward the end of next year, mayoral elections will be held in the two existing and three new special municipalities, whose total population is 13.7 million.
This urban population is the decisive element that will decide the overall winner and loser in national elections. It should also be borne in mind that the makeup of urban and rural populations is markedly different in terms of age, education, employment categories etc.
Looking at the figures more closely, the pan-blue and pan-green camps on this occasion won 47.8 and 45.3 percent of the vote respectively. If we add the 7 percent that went to candidates who broke KMT party discipline by standing in the elections, were expelled and went on to stand as independents, the ratio of votes going to the pan-blue and pan-green camps was still about 55 to 45. Although the DPP’s vote grew in relative terms, which should be affirmed, when it comes to the absolute vote distribution, the green camp is still looking at a gap of 2 million votes. The DPP definitely still has room for growth as it regenerates.
Apart from its core values of clean government and love of the native land, the DPP cannot shirk the challenge of keeping up with the times by putting forward a more concrete policy platform.
The DPP is a growing party that sticks to its Taiwanese values. We in the DPP need to look to the future and think rationally about what direction to take politically, what our core values are and how we can make a new start and win back Taiwan.
Hong Chi-chang is former chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation and a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath