Most people understand the phrase “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.”
Most, but not Chinese officials visiting Taiwan. How else how could one explain Straits Exchange Foundation Secretary-General Kao Koong-lian’s (高孔廉) announcement on Wednesday that a “special zone” would be set up for protesters during next month’s cross-strait talks in Taichung?
Mention of a special zone brings to mind Beijing during last year’s Olympic Games, when Chinese officials designated three parks around the city where their disgruntled citizens could gather — if approved — to let off steam. This, of course, turned out to be a sham as none of the protests received official approval.
Chinese officials, it seems, would much rather hire thugs to lock people up in “black jails” than let them vent grievances or opinions that vary from the party line or cause official embarrassment.
While plans for Taichung’s “protest zone” have yet to be revealed, it is safe to say that it would will be located far away from the Chinese delegation’s hotel or any of the locations it will visit.
Such an outcome will be unacceptable to protesters, who will be unlikely to stay in the zones if the Chinese delegation is nowhere near.
Officials charged with protecting the Chinese are probably worried there will be a repeat of the scenes in Taipei last year, when Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) was trapped in a hotel until the early hours of the morning by protesters and spent much of the rest of his time in the Grand Hotel.
One could argue, however, that the protests turned violent last year as a result of police provocation and their initial overreaction in confiscating Republic of China (ROC) flags and manhandling dozens of peaceful protesters.
Chinese officials may not be used to directly encountering protests in their own country, and they may not want to admit to the existence of the ROC, but it will certainly not harm them to see a flag they don’t recognize or hear a dissenting voice.
Taiwan, after all, is a democracy where demonstrations are the norm. It should not be turned into a replica of China every time an important Chinese official visits. Chen and his colleagues should understand this and so should President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government.
The government has already repeated the message from last year that “lawful protesters” will be protected. If by “lawful” this means protesting within a special zone kilometers away from Chen and his entourage, however, it should not be surprised if there is a repeat of last year’s disorder. Short of holding the meetings on Green Island, it will be impossible to shield the Chinese from protests.
Of course, Chen’s personal safety should be paramount, but many other countries deal with protesters without resorting to such draconian measures. If ensuring Chen’s safety is going to temporarily turn Taiwan into a de facto vassal state and result in the disenfranchising of decent people trying to make their opinions heard, then it would be better for everyone if Chen not did not come to Taiwan and the talks were held in a third country such as Singapore, where Chinese delegations have long felt more at home.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS