Most people understand the phrase “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.”
Most, but not Chinese officials visiting Taiwan. How else how could one explain Straits Exchange Foundation Secretary-General Kao Koong-lian’s (高孔廉) announcement on Wednesday that a “special zone” would be set up for protesters during next month’s cross-strait talks in Taichung?
Mention of a special zone brings to mind Beijing during last year’s Olympic Games, when Chinese officials designated three parks around the city where their disgruntled citizens could gather — if approved — to let off steam. This, of course, turned out to be a sham as none of the protests received official approval.
Chinese officials, it seems, would much rather hire thugs to lock people up in “black jails” than let them vent grievances or opinions that vary from the party line or cause official embarrassment.
While plans for Taichung’s “protest zone” have yet to be revealed, it is safe to say that it would will be located far away from the Chinese delegation’s hotel or any of the locations it will visit.
Such an outcome will be unacceptable to protesters, who will be unlikely to stay in the zones if the Chinese delegation is nowhere near.
Officials charged with protecting the Chinese are probably worried there will be a repeat of the scenes in Taipei last year, when Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) was trapped in a hotel until the early hours of the morning by protesters and spent much of the rest of his time in the Grand Hotel.
One could argue, however, that the protests turned violent last year as a result of police provocation and their initial overreaction in confiscating Republic of China (ROC) flags and manhandling dozens of peaceful protesters.
Chinese officials may not be used to directly encountering protests in their own country, and they may not want to admit to the existence of the ROC, but it will certainly not harm them to see a flag they don’t recognize or hear a dissenting voice.
Taiwan, after all, is a democracy where demonstrations are the norm. It should not be turned into a replica of China every time an important Chinese official visits. Chen and his colleagues should understand this and so should President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government.
The government has already repeated the message from last year that “lawful protesters” will be protected. If by “lawful” this means protesting within a special zone kilometers away from Chen and his entourage, however, it should not be surprised if there is a repeat of last year’s disorder. Short of holding the meetings on Green Island, it will be impossible to shield the Chinese from protests.
Of course, Chen’s personal safety should be paramount, but many other countries deal with protesters without resorting to such draconian measures. If ensuring Chen’s safety is going to temporarily turn Taiwan into a de facto vassal state and result in the disenfranchising of decent people trying to make their opinions heard, then it would be better for everyone if Chen not did not come to Taiwan and the talks were held in a third country such as Singapore, where Chinese delegations have long felt more at home.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS