President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) recently called on local universities and colleges in Taiwan to develop “all-English curriculums” to both woo foreign students and enhance Taiwanese students’ competitive edge in the global employment market.
Ma also said he would urge the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to increase the annual Taiwan Scholarships budget to attract more talented foreign students. Ma called for the globalization of Taiwan’s higher education in response to the declining birth rate in Taiwan.
Here are some personal comments based on my experience with foreign students over many years.
What would induce young foreigners to choose Taiwan as a place to pursue advanced studies? They would first evaluate the potential gains of studying in Taiwan. If the costs of airfare, living expenses, tuition and time are heavy, while gains are little or nothing, they would not come to Taiwan.
This is the bottleneck that local universities and colleges face. Even if the financial cost of foreign students coming to Taiwan for studies could be subsidized with scholarships, the key question of what they would “gain” has not yet been solved.
People in Taiwan tend to believe that we are a high-tech society. However, based on the examples of wafer foundry and biotechnology, the truth is that we are still far behind developed countries.
Why then would outstanding foreign students come to Taiwan to learn non-pioneer technologies?
Over the past 40 years, the only area in which Taiwan has accumulated substantial know-how and now has a bank of human talent is the agricultural sector. However, agriculture never gained the respect of either the government or universities. In many third world countries, half of the labor force is still employed in agriculture. This is the area where we could offer meaningful assistance. These countries are the potential sources of foreign students for Taiwan.
I was authorized by the administration of National Chung Hsing University several years ago to draft a plan to establish an “all-English curriculum” for the International Master Program of Agriculture. It was not an easy task.
Although a number of Taiwanese professors say their courses are taught in English, actual communication in the classrooms is a mixture of English and Chinese. Often teachers and students speak Chinese, while their PowerPoint slides are in English — sometimes, even the slides are a mixture of the two languages.
There are also a few cases in which professors never offered a single course in English, but still recruit foreign graduate students to their laboratories. They seem to have taken on foreign graduate students to impress people. These foreign graduate students, although given many scholarships, have not received quality educations in Taiwan. They became laboratory assistants in exchange for a diploma to take back to their homelands. I have also known a few foreign students studying as undergraduates in Taiwan.
Their stories are more painful than those of foreign graduate students. Some of them have already failed three or four times in calculus and general chemistry — required undergraduate courses — because instructors taught only in Chinese. Apparently not all universities — or all departments — are fully prepared to accept foreign students.
A common question is: Why don’t those foreign students learn Chinese before coming to Taiwan like most of us learned English before we went to the US, England or Australia to study? This is not a practical solution. Why would an African student spend a few years first mastering Chinese in order to study biotechnology in Taiwan? In addition, Chinese courses are not generally available in the same way as English courses are here and in most countries.
European countries such as the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland, where the native languages are not English, have striven hard in recent years to offer all-English curriculums to attract international students. Many prestigious institutions of higher education in those countries have taught a substantial portion of international students. Language is the key.
The Canadian godfather of mass communication, Marshall McLuhan, said: “The medium is the message.”
English language is the medium for internationalizing our local universities. It is also the message to attract foreign students.
Establishing an all-English, four-year undergraduate curriculum in Taiwan is much more difficult than establishing a graduate program, because undergraduate students need to take more than 100 credits in an array of courses, including general courses, general-education courses and professional courses. If we are to implement the Ma’s ideas, we will need many faculty members who can use English as their communication medium in the classroom and in their course Web pages.
Based on our experience of promoting an all-English curriculum in the International Master Program of Agriculture, we should pay close attention to candidates’ level of English when recruiting new faculty members. It should be understood by all involved that a new faculty member should be able to offer courses completely in English. With such a corps of competent professors ready, we will be able to develop “all-English curriculums” to benefit both local and foreign students.
Israel Bau-Jen Jiang is the academic secretary to the dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources at National Chung Hsing University in Taichung.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS