On Wednesday, central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) met ranking officials from three state-run banks and asked them to pay attention to the ability of borrowers to repay loans, not just admire the value of the collateral.
The central bank’s unusual move came just three weeks after it issued a press statement voicing concerns that an inflow of hot money would have adverse implications for the nation’s economic and financial stability.
It also came after the central bank increased sales of negotiable certificates of deposit and certificates of deposit to drain excess funds from the money market.
While the central bank declined to comment on whether the housing market is overheating, the perception in financial circles is that the central bank is using open-market operations to fend off a potential property bubble.
Coincidently, the Council for Economic Planning and Development last week invited academics to discuss ways of curbing the rise in house prices. Elsewhere, several government officials have expressed concern over the worsening problem of housing unaffordability.
An asset bubble is doomed to take place in Taiwan, as well as in other economies, after interest rates were cut over the past year to support slowing economies amid the global financial crisis. With interest rates so low, financial regulators now face a surging capital inflow and rising asset prices.
In recent weeks, governments including Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea and India have adopted measures to prevent their domestic property markets from presenting bubble symptoms.
Experience suggests, however, that the limits of those measures will soon be reached, and that interest rate hikes will be the next step. A key question for central banks is how quickly they should act.
One concern is that raising rates too early might stall economic recovery in those Asian economies where signs of sustainable growth are yet to emerge.
Another concern is that, as risk appetite begins to build in Asia along with the rebounding economy, a quick rate hike would likely boost the so-called “carry trade” — in which investors borrow from countries with ultra-low interest rates and invest in countries with higher rates — thus aggravating what we have already seen in Asia with price surges in equities, real estate and other assets.
In its latest economic outlook for Asia released on Thursday, the IMF said that striking a balance between growth and inflation would be one of the three major policy challenges for Asian economies this year and next year.
Even so, the problem of excess funds in the money market is the most compelling issue for Asian economies, including Taiwan, at this time.
Rather than use credit-tightening measures to quietly discourage speculative financial transactions, governments might consider whether directing surplus capital into sectors that can generate real production — as opposed to financial investment in equities, real estate and commodities — is a wiser approach.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS