The word “fence” has different meanings. As a noun, it can denote a barrier or divider. Robert Frost has the well-known line, “Good fences make good neighbors,” in his poem Mending Wall. The verb “to fence” describes a sport of swordsmanship where opponents use blunted foils, epees or sabers to register hits on each other.
But there is third, and totally different, meaning. “Fence” can also describe a person who receives and sells stolen goods or who acts as a conduit for stolen goods; this is the meaning that Taiwanese need to become aware of, because it concerns their president.
In the world of crime, thieves often steal things not for their personal use but for the profit from resale value. An art thief will steal famous works of art not because he has a taste for art, but because he knows private collectors will secretly pay good money for them. Diamond thieves steal diamonds and jewelry not because they have a flair for wearing jewelry but again because these items have a high resale value. Even petty thieves who want quick cash will steal lesser items if the items are in high enough demand to secure a quick resale.
To accomplish and profit from these actions, the thieves need a fence. In such transactions, the fence makes a handsome commission from the sale price of the stolen goods; the thief, while not getting market value for the stolen goods, still makes a sizeable profit. The buyer profits because he gets the stolen item for less than the normal market value. The only one who loses is the person whose property is stolen.
This poses an interesting ethical question: Whose crime is worse, that of the thief, that of the fence or that of the buyer if he or she knows the purchase involves stolen goods?
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) came to Taiwan, it took over not only the nation’s assets but even the private property of individuals. These are what are often referred to in matters of transitional justice as the “stolen state assets” — though the personal assets of families should also be included in these crimes. With the KMT running a party-state, some of these assets went directly to KMT members and families while others benefited the party as a whole.
How many homes did dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) possess? Which KMT families got hold of ready-made businesses? With KMT control of the National Assembly, the Legislative Yuan and the courts for nearly a half a century, the paper trail for such thievery has been destroyed and/or buried.
Further, under martial law, anyone who challenged such theft would end up dead, in prison or, at a minimum, helpless with no recourse to the courts. As a result the KMT became — and remains — one of the richest political parties in the world.
Transitional justice has never been served in Taiwan. Yet there is more. Surprisingly, some assets are still in the hands of the KMT. This is where President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), the current chairman of the KMT, comes in.
Ma professes that in the name of cleaning up the party’s image, he is going to divest the party of these assets and sell them off. All well and good, except for one catch: The KMT will keep the money from the process and use it to pay for the pensions of its members and various debts. This, again, is Ma doublespeak.
Can Taiwanese not see that the remainder of their stolen goods are being fenced? Transitional justice has not been served, yet Ma hopes to finally bury the whole matter of stolen assets through a simple action.
Ma has already earned a variety of nasty nicknames. Now he is working on yet another: The Fence.
When will it end?
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS