Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), always smiling and silent, has once again been entrusted with an important position by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Ma appointed Siew as the “chief architect” and director of the committee organizing the 100th anniversary celebrations of what is now a nominal Republic of China (ROC) in 2011.
Hopefully, Siew will live up to Ma’s expectations and put on a presentable show.
Siew has done this kind of job twice in the past, and both times they have turned out to be shams. After eight years of treading water, he returned to politics to serve as Ma’s running mate in last year’s presidential election becoming the “chief architect” of the effort to shape Ma’s image as a “Taiwan-loving” man, while endorsing Ma and guaranteeing that he would not sell out the country.
After winning the election, however, Ma ignored public suffering and revealed his true colors as he has succumbed to China at the expense of Taiwanese sovereignty. As Ma’s accomplice, how could Siew serve as Ma’s stand-in with a clear conscience?
As the government’s economic coordinator, Siew has promoted an economic strategy of relying on China in the belief that it will help kick start Taiwan’s economy. But after a year and a half of the Ma administration, the nation is suffering economic recession, high unemployment, large government debt and the migration of domestic capital and technology to China. Taiwan has been transformed from an Asian tiger into a docile kitten.
These two failures stemmed from mistaken premises. Siew touted Ma’s “Taiwan-loving” image on the mistaken assumption that Ma was sincere and trustworthy, but those are two qualities Ma has all but squandered. Siew’s design of Ma’s image succeeded in tricking people into voting for him, but it was a vicious swindle at the expense of the Taiwanese people.
Furthermore, Siew mischaracterized the Chinese economy as a free market economy, when in reality, it is politically directed — China uses the economy as a political tool to achieve its goal of annexing Taiwan. Using the EU as an example to excuse shackling Taiwan’s economy to China’s is nothing but an act of deception, both to oneself but also to the public at large. Each EU member is a sovereign state that recognizes each of the other member states — they do not seek to annex other members.
If Siew, as the coordinator of the ROC’s 100th anniversary celebrations, wants to live up to public expectations, the priority should be to make sure the centenarian has nothing to do with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). If the founders of the ROC had not defined their goals, but instead just fought to overthrow the Qing Dynasty, they would never have won public support.
Siew should invite the PRC, the US and Japan to the event and let China broadcast the celebrations live on Chinese TV. The ROC government should only invite them because it is the polite and friendly thing to do.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS