Minister of Education Wu Ching-chi (吳清基) has proposed changing the maximum proportion of classical Chinese in high school Chinese textbooks from 45 percent to 65 percent. The change will apply from the next academic year. The classical Chinese that Chinese intellectuals Hu Shih (胡適) and Chen Duxiu (陳獨秀) fought against 90 years ago is making a comeback in our high school curriculums.
We believe Wu himself and the professors on the Joint Board of the College Recruitment Commission would not pass the classical Chinese tests they are proposing. Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has a doctorate and admires Chinese culture, we even wonder how he would fare on the tests Wu and his associates want to implement.
More classical Chinese texts and tests in high schools is harsh on students and will undermine their interest in literature.
Tzeng Ching-wen (鄭清文) is the only Taiwanese writer to have won an international award in literature — the Kiriyama Pacific Rim Book Prize — since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime fled to Taiwan 60 years ago. The plain language, humanity and moral integrity of the people in his works have drawn admiration from literary circles at home and abroad. Yet the excerpts from his works (which include Taiwanese) in high school textbooks seldom come with footnotes or translations, so teachers say they can’t teach them.
A key problem is that since the Qing Dynasty, professors of Chinese literature have played a dominant role in controlling high school literature education. In Taiwan, the focus on classical Chinese has stifled the development of Taiwanese literature.
Long dominated by narrow-minded scholars of Chinese literature, elementary and high school literature education has failed to reflect the native culture of Taiwan and has lagged behind changes and trends in world literature.
As a result, Taiwanese students have not come into contact with the inspiring works of poet Lai He (賴和) and novelist Lu Ho-jo (呂赫若). They have also missed out on classics of world literature such as Shakespeare’s plays and Greek and Roman mythology.
The lack of art and culture programs on TV in Taiwan is also a result of the domination of classical Chinese literature in school curriculums.
Increasing the proportion of classical Chinese content in high school textbooks is an indication that Chinese colonial education is being implemented.
Soon, former minister of education Tu Cheng-sheng’s (杜正勝) proposal that Taiwanese and Chinese history receive equal attention in the high school curriculum may also be scrapped.
In the years since its founding, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has failed to place enough importance on educational reform. If the DPP continues to sit by and let Taiwanese students be kept from learning about their native culture, we will be forced to act.
Cheng Cheng-yu is president of the Taiwan Southern Society; Chen Gau-tzu is president of the Taiwan Northern Society; Winston Yu is president of the Eastern Taiwan Society; Chen Wan-der is president of the Taiwan Central Society; Chang Yeh-shen is president of the Taiwan Hakka Society; Ellen Huang is president of the Taiwan Green Shield Party; and Tsay Ting-kuei is chairman of the Alliance of Referendum for Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath