Now you see them ...
Dear Johnny,
Lately, I have seen flags flying all about the city and I smile. Then I remember that this means there are no “particular” Chinese officials in town, or something like that.
I really hope that those flags can stay all year round, because I love this country. However, I have no doubt — prove me wrong, President Ma — that the flags will disappear come the right time. Yes, that Chen [Yunlin, 陳雲林] guy!
Taking down your national flag when foreigners are in town is so degrading. This nonsense has got to stop.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Johnny replies: Yes, but who is going to stop it? You could name any number of symbolic insults that will accompany the arrival of Chicom negotiators, but the only people who will object at this time are dyed-in-the-wool activists with little practical support from ordinary people. And even a lot of these people are not prepared to get into trouble by making a powerful statement of resistance.
Mark my words. The moment the ordinary person’s hip pocket starts emptying over Chinese trade deals, the climate will change. If they know what’s good for them, activists will be carefully preparing for that moment.
In the meantime, what are you, as a person most locals would regard as a foreigner, willing and able to do, other than write letters to me?
BBC smackdown, please
Dear Johnny,
I just read the letter entitled “BBC on the ‘offensive’” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 10, page 8) on longtime resident Michael’s disappointment with the BBC. But the BBC’s reply wasn’t as good as your reading of it made it out to be.
Here’s something I wrote on the Taiwan Matters blog about one “white terror” (sic) story by the Beeb: taiwanmatters.blogspot.com/2008/07/sorry-ass-bbc-misreports-taiwan-again.html.
In it I cover the many unforgivable errors and insults made by writer Caroline Gluck and the BBC, and I link to 11 earlier critiques — from just the two previous years — written by myself and fellow blogger Michael Turton on the BBC’s inaccurate and downright dishonest reporting on Taiwan.
There is a pattern here. I don’t think that the BBC can be “educated” because everything I see tells me that it’s on purpose. Please give the BBC the verbal smackdown they deserve.
TIM MADDOG
Taichung
Johnny replies: No matter how sloppy the BBC reports may be, this style of reporting is not unique to Taiwan coverage and their reports no doubt enrage activists around the world. For now, my challenge to you is this: Explain why the BBC would be “dishonest.”
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength