Now you see them ...
Dear Johnny,
Lately, I have seen flags flying all about the city and I smile. Then I remember that this means there are no “particular” Chinese officials in town, or something like that.
I really hope that those flags can stay all year round, because I love this country. However, I have no doubt — prove me wrong, President Ma — that the flags will disappear come the right time. Yes, that Chen [Yunlin, 陳雲林] guy!
Taking down your national flag when foreigners are in town is so degrading. This nonsense has got to stop.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Johnny replies: Yes, but who is going to stop it? You could name any number of symbolic insults that will accompany the arrival of Chicom negotiators, but the only people who will object at this time are dyed-in-the-wool activists with little practical support from ordinary people. And even a lot of these people are not prepared to get into trouble by making a powerful statement of resistance.
Mark my words. The moment the ordinary person’s hip pocket starts emptying over Chinese trade deals, the climate will change. If they know what’s good for them, activists will be carefully preparing for that moment.
In the meantime, what are you, as a person most locals would regard as a foreigner, willing and able to do, other than write letters to me?
BBC smackdown, please
Dear Johnny,
I just read the letter entitled “BBC on the ‘offensive’” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 10, page 8) on longtime resident Michael’s disappointment with the BBC. But the BBC’s reply wasn’t as good as your reading of it made it out to be.
Here’s something I wrote on the Taiwan Matters blog about one “white terror” (sic) story by the Beeb: taiwanmatters.blogspot.com/2008/07/sorry-ass-bbc-misreports-taiwan-again.html.
In it I cover the many unforgivable errors and insults made by writer Caroline Gluck and the BBC, and I link to 11 earlier critiques — from just the two previous years — written by myself and fellow blogger Michael Turton on the BBC’s inaccurate and downright dishonest reporting on Taiwan.
There is a pattern here. I don’t think that the BBC can be “educated” because everything I see tells me that it’s on purpose. Please give the BBC the verbal smackdown they deserve.
TIM MADDOG
Taichung
Johnny replies: No matter how sloppy the BBC reports may be, this style of reporting is not unique to Taiwan coverage and their reports no doubt enrage activists around the world. For now, my challenge to you is this: Explain why the BBC would be “dishonest.”
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS