The 10th anniversary on Monday of the 921 Earthquake, one of the nation’s worst natural disasters, was a day to recall both the tragedy and the heroic rescue efforts that followed. Images run by TV and newspapers from the catastrophe that claimed more than 2,400 lives brought back the pain and fear of the days following the disaster as the extent of the death and destruction became apparent.
The sadness on this year’s anniversary was compounded by fresh suffering in the wake of Typhoon Morakot. In the weeks after Morakot swept over Taiwan on the weekend of Aug. 7, the death toll steadily climbed and is now more than 700. But in addition to the lives lost, entire communities are struggling to clean up mud, rocks and deadwood brought by violent rains that exceeded more than the average precipitation for an entire year. Farmers are at a loss on how to start over, with many fish farmers unsure if they will qualify for subsidies because their farms were unlicensed — operating illegally while authorities turned a blind eye.
After the magnitude 7.3 quake struck on Sept. 21, 1999, the government and military responses were swift. But recovery in the wake of a disaster of that scale is a slow process, as Morakot has reminded us. Praise must go to those who worked not just to scour and pull the injured from the rubble of the quake, but also to the long-term efforts that went into rebuilding lives, homes and communities.
Comparisons between the 921 Earthquake and Morakot are unavoidable, mainly because of the extent of the devastation caused by the two disasters and because people today so vividly remember the deadly temblor.
The government’s slow response to Morakot left tens of thousands in the disaster zone feeling shocked and helpless. The public anger that swelled to the point of compelling a Cabinet reshuffle remains.
While the resentment is justified, it will be important over the next few years to maintain a public discussion about the disaster that is not limited to political fallout. Even so, Morakot has the potential to be a deciding factor in the year-end regional elections.
If the nation hopes to come out of Morakot safer and better prepared for catastrophe than it was before, the debate must focus on a number of points: improving the government’s disaster response; spending reconstruction funds efficiently and transparently; seeking a fair solution for communities whose homes were destroyed or are no longer safe; and implementing sustainable development.
None of these goals will be easy, and already many Aboriginal villages are concerned that any solution the government offers will have negative effects for their communities, and by extension the preservation of their identity and culture.
Achieving sustainable development, meanwhile, seems impossible given the track record of the nation’s leaders — both in the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and previous governments. Sustainable development will require major economic reforms, including scaling down mountain agriculture and fish farms to counteract mudslides and land subsidence. It will also involve major investment in improving infrastructure, while projects such as the expansion of the Zengwun Reservoir may have to be scrapped.
As we reflect on the nation’s recovery in the decade since the 921 temblor — which was no small feat — it is clear that Taiwan can recover from this disaster, too. It is, however, a daunting task that will take years, and the public must demand substantial improvements of its government if Taiwan is to emerge from this tragedy.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS