In past years September has seen headlines about Taiwan’s bid for UN membership ahead of the annual UN General Assembly meeting in New York. Despite setbacks deriving from Chinese obstruction, the bids helped raise Taiwan’s international profile, showing the international community that the Taiwanese people want to be recognized.
The annual bid was also symbolic, with the government proclaiming to the world its sovereignty and that Taiwan is not part of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
The distinction between the Republic of China and the PRC, however, is blurring as the former gradually fades on the international stage with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in power.
One example of this was the nation’s bid to rejoin the UN last year in which Ma’s administration departed from the usual path of having Taiwan’s allies speak on its behalf at the UN General Assembly for full membership in the organization. Instead, the government, citing Ma’s modus vivendi foreign policy, which the government describes as a “more pragmatic and practical strategy,” proposed Taiwan be allowed to “participate meaningfully in the activities of UN specialized agencies.”
While the government hailed Taiwan’s accession to the World Health Assembly as an observer in May as a manifestation of this new approach, it failed to offer a clear account of dubious dealings with China in the process.
This year, not only has the Ma administration decided against a bid for full UN membership, it has yet to finalize in what ways and in which affiliated organizations it plans to participate.
So much for seeking Taiwan’s “meaningful participation in UN specialized agencies.” It appears the government isn’t really enthusiastic about pushing Taiwan’s interests in this regard.
“Given the current international environment, flexible diplomacy, which is pragmatic and practical, is the most accurate diplomatic approach for Taiwan to take,” Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) has said.
However, under Ma’s diplomatic ceasefire with Beijing, the government appears to be disarming itself diplomatically as China continues to encroach on Taiwan’s visibility.
While some may argue that the result of this is warming relations with China, the truth is that Taiwan’s sovereignty is being diminished.
It is pathetic that the president of a democratic country would so easily relinquish the opportunity to fight for his country’s place in the world and assert his nation’s sovereignty.
Despite the government’s lack of interest in pushing for UN membership, a group of ardent Taiwanese flew to New York this week to campaign for Taiwan’s inclusion. However, there is only so much civic groups can do.
If the government cannot be bothered to fight for recognition on the global stage, it will only be a matter of time before the world starts to view Taiwan as a natural part of China.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS