Typhoon Morakot wreaked havoc across southern Taiwan and most of the worst-hit areas were Aboriginal communities. Many Aboriginal villages were destroyed, which will have an impact on the traditional way of life of those who survived. Aborigines will face many difficulties.
Historically, Aboriginal societies have been largely self-sufficient.
However, after the government started institutionalizing its policies around 50 years ago, Aboriginal groups not only saw changes in their traditional political organization, but their societies edged closer to collapse.
Once they had to rely on the free-market economy to make a living, Aborigines had to start looking for jobs.
For a long time, Taiwan’s Aborigines have been at a disadvantage.
Because of limited arable land and employment opportunities in their homelands, large numbers of Aborigines have moved to the cities.
Many who leave their homes lack the resources and channels to gain access to higher education, with the result that a high proportion of the Aboriginal population can only gain employment doing menial and dangerous jobs.
As working conditions became tougher and the economy deteriorated, the government brought in large numbers of foreign workers. This lowered average wages in Taiwan and had a heavy impact on employment opportunities for Aborigines.
Despite the Indigenous Peoples Employment Rights Protection Act (原住民族工作權保障法), unemployment rates among Aborigines continue to rise and many have trouble even securing basic living standards, including sufficient food and clothing.
In recent years, recognizing the rights of indigenous peoples has become an international trend.
After the typhoon, issues such as the reconstruction of Aboriginal areas and whether villages should be relocated have sparked debate.
A link to tradition is a basic requirement of Aboriginal life and the government’s reconstruction plans cannot overlook Aboriginal needs and demands.
Those in power should consider the situation from the perspective of Aborigines and show respect for their desire to preserve their culture.
If the government plans to relocate communities away from landslide-prone mountainous areas, it should provide assistance to preserve their culture.
In addition, while housing disaster victims temporarily at shelters, the government should draw up reconstruction plans that take Aboriginal culture into consideration.
Doing so could help restore the collective culture of Aboriginal groups.
Let us hope that Taiwan will show more concern for and identification with Aboriginal groups and help them reconstruct their homes.
We should treat Aborigines and their cultures based on the principles of equality and respect.
In addition, improving the economic conditions of Aborigines is an essential factor in promoting ethnic harmony.
Protecting the livelihood of Aboriginal groups is in line with the principles of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Following these principles would help us align our practices with international trends and practices in Aboriginal policy.
This is the only way to protect the rights and interests of Aborigines.
Lee Yung-ran is a lawyer and president of the Chinese Association for Human Rights.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers