It’s a hot and sticky summer afternoon in Silicon Valley, and a group of students are chatting over drinks and food, having just completed the final presentations for their course. On the surface, the scenes of jollity and relief are familiar from institutions around the world. Here, though, things are different. These are no ordinary graduates: They are the first class to pass through Singularity University.
The brainchild of futurist Ray Kurzweil and his friend Peter Diamandis, the pioneer of personal space flight and founder of the X Prize Foundation, Singularity University (SU) is meant to be a summer camp for people to learn about emerging technologies from the experts.
Over the summer, 40 students with diverse backgrounds — among them medicine, physics, computing and law — were brought together and given an intensive training course in the most important futuristic ideas. The ultimate objective? As its slogan says: “Preparing humanity for accelerating technological change.”
It is a lofty and ambitious goal. When it was formally announced at the Technology, Entertainment, Design conference this year, the idea raised some eyebrows. Kurzweil, after all, has a reputation as something of a maverick — he believes that computers will become independently intelligent in the near future, for example — and some were concerned that the idea of a crash course in the future was a gimmick. However, the project gained a number of backers and more than US$2 million in funding. It was reality.
Housed on Moffett Federal Airfield, a former naval base south of San Francisco that is now used as a research center by NASA, the Singularity program ran in a building that is used regularly by the agency’s International Space University, which provided the model for SU.
Over the past nine weeks, the students have attended classes from more than 100 faculty advisers and speakers, who have given their time for free as part of the experiment. The subjects included biotechnology, space research, artificial intelligence and nanotech; visitors included luminaries such as Vint Cerf and Bob Metcalfe, often called the “fathers of the Internet,” as well as Nobel laureate and physicist George Smoot and 21st-century success stories such as game design legend Will Wright and billionaire investor Peter Thiel.
The students — or their sponsors — have paid US$25,000 each to attend this high-tech summer camp. The cost was not a deterrent, however: staff had to sift through more than 1,200 applications, said Salim Ismail, executive director of the project.
There is a largely balanced gender ratio, an international tendency and the average age is 31. But most difficult, said Ismail, was picking out a broad mix of skills.
“Clearly, if we had 40 nanotechnologists, it wouldn’t be a good mix. So we thought carefully about how many of each discipline we wanted in that founding class, and I think we’ve succeeded: They’re a frightening bunch,” he said.
The real point, he says, is to arm the students with the tools they need to go out and make a difference in the world, using the smartest and fastest-growing technologies to overcome some of the planet’s major problems.
And it’s not only the students who will benefit from the program. Tara Lemmey of Lens Ventures is an investor, entrepreneur and former head of the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has been running one of the project’s academic tracks. She believes the experience was almost as illuminating for those who taught classes and gave talks as it was for the students.
“We learned from each other,” she said. “We learned how to think about engaging people, the hard questions that come up. The students are covering so much subject matter, and we don’t as the faculty — we cover ours and sit in as many as we can. So it’s a real mash-up of some of the most interesting, provocative ideas.”
The first stage of the course involved a wide range of lectures, talks and discussions that touched briefly on a variety of topics. After that, students could take a deeper look at more particular subject areas. After this came the final project phase, which lasted a couple of weeks.
This part of the scheme was intended to let the students demonstrate what they had learned, rather than produce blunt commercial pitches — but by the time the presentations came along, some of the students were clearly eyeing investment from the gaggle of venture capitalists gathered in the audience.
Gettaround, a peer-to-peer car-sharing system that helps people make money from their vehicles — a polished concept complete with technology demo — certainly had business chops, but it remained unclear how it would revolutionize the lives of billions.
Another team, One Global Voice, put forward plans for a software platform that would help entrepreneurs in emerging economies build SMS applications. Xidar, a team including two Britons — entrepreneur Simon Daniel and banker-turned-neuroscientist Laurence Hayes — proposed a suite of emergency systems that would help save lives during a major disaster.
One of the most intriguing projects, though, was Acasa, a scheme to build houses using 3D printing technology. The concept boiled down to a portable, programmable gantry that piped concrete into customized patterns, building up layer upon layer of material until the shell of a building was complete. The system, its creators said, could build an entire house in less than two days: they plan to form a company and try to raise money to help build houses on a large scale in the developing world.
One of the Acasa team, Marianne Ryan, who is finishing a degree at the University of Michigan’s School of Information, said that approaching huge problems became far easier through the unique combination of experts with different backgrounds.
“It was interesting, because I do have some colleagues here who are already doctors or are doing PhDs in bioinformatics — I thought it would be really challenging to develop a curriculum that would speak to them as well as to me. Somehow they managed to find the sweet spot,” she said.
Their presentations done, the class could let off a little steam. Sofya Yampolsky, a graduate student from New York with a background in arts and future studies, explains how her sense of perspective and scale had drastically altered since she began the course.
“There was so much to learn that it was difficult to believe that you could actually retain everything you’d heard — but a salient point was calling a friend of mine back in Boston,” she said. “All of a sudden all these facts kept surfacing about nanotech and networks and computing that I didn’t anticipate that I’d retained.”
“I don’t think there’s such a thing as a normal life after SU. It just changes the way you see the world,” she said. “Now when someone says anything less than a billion people, it doesn’t seem like a big deal. The numbers, the scale, has drastically changed. The vision is so much bigger.”
With results like that, Ismail said the inaugural class went as well as anybody could have predicted.
“The students have been phenomenal — we’ve attracted some of the top thinkers in the world. Every week or two we’ve had some extraordinary figure come by and chat with the students,” he said.
Still, he said, this year is a work in progress. In the winter, the organization will run a course and next year it plans to expand the summer course to accommodate 120 students — a threefold increase. Will that change what happens? Will SU tweak its scheme?
“We’re tweaking almost non-stop,” he smiles. “This is essentially a real-time institution.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95