A number of indicators have shown how dissatisfied Taiwanese are with the performance of the Cabinet.
Aside from the volleys of criticism fired by critics and typhoon victims over the Cabinet’s poor judgment and sluggish execution of rescue operations in the wake of Typhoon Morakot, various opinion polls have also found Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) is particularly unpopular.
A recent survey conducted by the Chinese-language United Daily News, a media outlet generally perceived as sympathetic to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), put Liu’s approval rate at 20 percent. Meanwhile, a separate poll by TVBS, also known for its KMT-leaning stance, showed the approval rating for Liu’s performance had sunk to an embarrassing 13 percent.
In view of the numbers reflecting the public’s lack of confidence in the government’s administrative capability, Liu on Aug. 19 said he had reached a consensus with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to carry out an “across the board [Cabinet] reshuffle” early this month.
“The reshuffle will be a review across the board … of course I will be included in the assessment as well,” he said in response all of to the criticism.
Of course the government had to say something like that to stop the nosedive in ratings and to buy some time. It is fully aware of the shortness of most people’s attention spans. This deft move gave the impression that the government was addressing public concerns, while at the same time creating a window of delay in which people might forget what they were so angry about.
Now, two weeks later, Liu, commenting on the same topic on Tuesday, said the reshuffle would be moderate.
“The scale [of the reshuffle] will just be a little bit more than small-scale,” he said.
In other words, the reshuffle, slated to be announced on Monday, will not be as far-reaching as Liu promised.
By not conducting a full-scale review, the government has not only gone back on its word, it has insulted the public by assuming people will forgive and forget the administration’s ineptitude so quickly.
If Liu keeps his job as expected, it remains to be seen if the government will offer any justification for the decision or if it will act as though Liu’s performance has been acceptable.
This is reminiscent of last November when, faced with mounting protests, Liu famously said: “This kind of thing will blow over in a couple of days.”
The public has witnessed the incompetence of the Cabinet under Liu’s leadership, ruining public confidence in the government’s efficiency and crisis management. As the nation braces for the increasing threat of influenza A(H1N1), people have no faith in this government’s ability to care for them. An across-the-board Cabinet reshuffle as promised is therefore crucial to rebooting the public’s confidence in the government.
In an interview in May, Liu on his own initiative laid out three scenarios under which he would resign from the premiership.
“The three scenarios are: whether the people are not satisfied with me, whether the president is not satisfied with me and whether I am not satisfied with myself,” he said. “I will leave the post if any of these three find me unsatisfactory.”
Whether Ma is satisfied with Liu or whether Liu is satisfied with himself are a function of how out of touch the two are, but one thing is perfectly clear: The majority of Taiwanese are not satisfied with Liu’s performance.
How can Ma expect the public to believe the government he leads is capable if the upcoming Cabinet reshuffle turns out to be little more than a perfunctory act — and with such an incompetent premier leading the pack?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with