Despite repeated apologies at a press conference on Tuesday, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) repeatedly stressed that his leadership is strong and forceful. I believe it would be difficult to find someone who would not be angered by these remarks.
Ma offered five apologies. An apology is an expression of one’s regret for making a mistake, yet Ma repeatedly praised his own leadership throughout the press conference. Since his leadership is strong and forceful, he obviously did not have anything to apologize for. He must have been apologizing for others. But who?
First, Ma said the biggest problem with Typhoon Morakot was the unprecedented rainfall — the largest amount in 200 years.
The first party to have made a mistake, then, was obviously the gods, so Ma must have been apologizing on their behalf.
Then, Ma said many had been taught a lesson that leaving dangerous places is the best policy. This clearly reflected his earlier discontent over the failure of locals to evacuate. Ma, then, must have been apologizing for those buried alive in the mudslides who were wrong not to flee.
Third, four days after the Sept. 21, 1999, earthquake, then president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) issued an emergency decree. More than 70 percent of the public believe that Ma should also have done so to avoid disruption in the chain of command. Ma, however, said such orders cannot be issued recklessly because this would violate the democratic spirit. Democracy was thus to blame, so Ma must have been apologizing on its behalf.
Fourth, Ma said the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act (災害防救法) is comprehensive, so an emergency decree was unnecessary. The act was thus to blame for being too perfect. But Ma also pledged to establish a disaster prevention and relief agency for effective and comprehensive planning. The government now would have to amend the act, which apparently isn’t so perfect after all. That means Ma was apologizing on behalf of the act, both for being perfect and for not being perfect enough.
Fifth, Ma’s leadership is clearly outstanding, and it is difficult for his team to be equally so. He promised to investigate the activities of his team — so they were definitely making mistakes.
But who in the team should be blamed? Many said the military departed for disaster zones only two hours after the 921 Earthquake, but that they procrastinated this time. When asked by journalists whether he had exercised his powers as commander-in-chief, he said “of course” and that he inspected the disaster areas in that status. Since Ma is such a brilliant commander, the troops must surely be to blame.
He also emphasized that according to the law, disaster prevention and relief is the responsibility of local governments with support from the central government. Local governments thus had greater responsibility for mistakes than the central government. His fifth apology, then, was on behalf of local government officials.
When asked why the Ministry of Foreign Affairs rejected foreign aid, Ma’s answer was very odd. He rebuked reporters for politicizing the issue, saying that they should focus on humanitarianism. Since the ministry’s rejection obviously was not a humanitarian issue, there was nothing wrong with the disaster relief effort, and an apology for this was unnecessary.
In feudal times, emperors issued edicts blaming themselves when natural disasters occurred. Ma issued an edict of sorts at the press conference, except that this edict blamed the gods, the law, democracy, the public and government officials. With such a president — blaming everyone else while praising himself — we can sigh and shed a tear.
But we will not accept his claims of innocence.
According to an Apple Daily opinion poll, very few respondents thought victims or the military were to blame. About 13 percent said local governments should be held responsible, 15 percent said the Cabinet was to blame and 45 percent blamed the president. The results of a CNN poll showed that 82 percent of respondents felt Ma should resign. A world-class embarrassment!
Surprisingly, the results of an ICRT opinion poll found that 97 percent of respondents thought Ma should quit. This English-language radio channel’s audience is largely in Greater Taipei, and many are highly educated young people — Ma biggest supporters, who are now displeased with him.
Finally, the most severely damaged areas were Aboriginal villages in which about 70 percent to 80 percent of locals backed Ma. His popularity is experiencing an unprecedented landslide among his two strongest support groups.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
On the eve of the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe (VE) Day, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a statement that provoked unprecedented repudiations among the European diplomats in Taipei. Chu said during a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting that what President William Lai (賴清德) has been doing to the opposition is equivalent to what Adolf Hitler did in Nazi Germany, referencing ongoing investigations into the KMT’s alleged forgery of signatures used in recall petitions against Democratic Progressive Party legislators. In response, the German Institute Taipei posted a statement to express its “deep disappointment and concern”
RSS