President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has been roundly condemned for his and the government’s lackadaisical attitude to the human suffering caused by Typhoon Morakot.
The lack of empathy shown to victims by Ma and senior Cabinet members in the days after Morakot struck has left a bad taste in the mouth of many that is not likely to fade. This could impact on the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) performance in December’s local elections, not to mention Ma’s chances of re-election in 2012.
Despite the public outrage, stepping down to take responsibility was never a realistic possibility. However, how Ma and a reshuffled administration deal with the challenges of reconstruction and resettlement will have a large say on his party’s prospects in the next presidential election.
The president has hoped to divert public anger, for example, by attributing the delay in rescue efforts following the storm to bad weather.
This has taken the spotlight away from the lack of pre-storm preparedness and the failure to evacuate people from areas that were at high risk of flooding, as has been done in the past.
What senior officials did — or rather failed to do — ahead of and during the storm has only begun to come to light.
Unfortunately, Ma, ever the opportunist, has taken advantage of the public’s lowered guard to further his cross-strait agenda, exploiting demands for improvements to government rescue efforts to make subtle yet significant changes to the military’s objectives. These changes will in all probability weaken an already demoralized fighting force.
Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Ma said that disaster prevention and rescue would become the main task of the armed forces and that nature — not China, with its 1,500 ballistic missiles and growing arsenal of high-tech weaponry — was now Taiwan’s biggest enemy.
Ma promised to buy 15 fewer Black Hawk helicopters from the US than previously planned and use the savings on new rescue equipment.
A disturbing consequence of Morakot, therefore, has been a further reduction in military strength and an even softer attitude toward the only country that threatens Taiwan. China’s belligerence has not waned, nor has it retracted its threat to use force against Taiwan.
Another issue that has escaped the attention of many in this time of crisis is the government’s failure to put together a UN bid this year.
In this respect, Morakot couldn’t have come at a more opportune moment for Ma and his discredited Cabinet.
If there is one thing that almost everyone can agree on in Taiwan, it is that Taiwan belongs in the UN. Yet, once again, Ma and his government have failed the public. As was seen with the initial refusal of post-Morakot foreign aid, the government’s primary consideration is cross-strait relations and what Beijing will think of its actions.
If Ma wants to win a second term, he needs to stop focusing on China and start focusing on Taiwan. His preoccupation with the “mainland” is hurting the very people who made him what he is.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS