Has Asia’s economic recovery reached a turning point?
Recent economic data, some unexpectedly good results from companies around the region, early signs of some new hiring, and a stock market rally that has defied most analysts’ expectations would seem to indicate that perhaps it has.
On Tuesday, economic reports from Singapore, the Philippines, Australia and China provided the latest fuel for hopes that Asia was on track for a recovery that would outpace that of Europe and the US and give the region more economic and political clout.
Even in Japan, which is mired in its deepest recession in decades, central bank Governor Masaaki Shirakawa struck an upbeat note after a rate-setting meeting on Tuesday.
“Asian economies seem to be growing at a faster pace,” Reuters quoted him as saying. “Since the spring, the financial system has also been improving. The overall direction is heading toward improvement.”
Still, Asia has depended heavily on government stimulus projects. Exports remain weak and a renewed downturn in the West — the primary market for Asian goods — or a turnaround in the rise in Asian stocks, could pose major risks.
But these days, economists see an improved economy.
“Things certainly look better than they did three months ago,” said Simon Wong, regional economist at Standard Chartered in Hong Kong.
All through the crisis that engulfed the world financial system and tipped much of the world into recession last year, Asia has had a major advantage: Its banks steered clear of the complex financial instruments that caused some Western banks to collapse. Asian governments and companies were in relatively sound financial health, having repaired their finances only recently after the Asian financial crisis of 1997 to 1998.
Asia’s export-dependent economies suffered badly when consumers and companies in the US and Europe curtailed purchases, leading to a collapse in Asian exports late last year. But over all, Asia has recovered more rapidly than most analysts had dared to hope, as governments spent heavily to lift their economies.
In recent weeks, companies like Sony, Panasonic and Samsung have reported better — or at least less bad — results for the quarter from April through June. Hyundai Motor even reported a record quarterly profit.
Although many companies are continuing to cut jobs, job recruiters in Asia say they see evidence that some companies are adding staff again.
“It’s been a very tough 10 months, but over the past six or seven weeks, we’ve seen a modest upturn in jobs activity in banking — albeit from a very, very low position,” said Nigel Heap, managing director for the recruitment firm Hays in Sydney. “We’re cautiously optimistic that the worst is over in Hong Kong and Singapore.”
China in particular has stood out in Asia. After years of double-digit growth, the Chinese economy stumbled this year. A giant spending package, deep interest-rate cuts and much greater lending by state-controlled banks have pulled the economy back to a healthy level of growth in recent months.
Data for last month, released by the statistics office on Tuesday, illustrated the point: Industrial output, an indicator of broader growth, rose 10.8 percent from a year earlier, while retail sales gained 15.2 percent.
Although the rise in output was less than expected, and exports took a further hit, economists at Goldman Sachs say they believe that China could return to growth of more than 10 percent as soon as next year. This week, Goldman raised its forecast for full-year growth for China to 9.4 percent. That was up from the 8.3 percent previously projected and higher than the government’s 8 percent target. For next year, the economists say they expect China to expand by 11.9 percent.
Not all economists agree that the picture is quite as rosy. For one thing, China’s policymakers now face a delicate balancing act. A spike in property and equities markets — the Shanghai stock index is up about 80 percent this year — has led many to worry that another bubble is in the making. Analysts say the authorities now have to scale back bank lending to deflate price spikes without choking growth.
Data on Tuesday showed that bank lending dropped off sharply last month, but so far most economists remained relaxed.
“We believe that investment in the coming months will continue to be well supported by lending that has already taken place,” Tao Wang, a economist at UBS in Shanghai, said in a note.
Exports, which account for about one-third of China’s economy, remain depressed, sinking 23 percent last month from a year earlier. The decline was smaller than economists had expected and indicated that external demand was steadily recovering, Qing Wang, China economist at Morgan Stanley, said in a note. But it nevertheless showed that overseas demand for Asian-made goods remained well below the level of a year ago.
At the same time, the pace of recovery is uneven across Asia.
In Australia, business confidence is at the highest level in almost two years, and the central bank has indicated that it could raise interest rates.
By contrast, Japan remains in a deep recession.
“The global economy has suffered a great shock,” Shirakawa said. “We can’t expect to see an impressive recovery.”
The key question now is what happens “beyond the near-term,” Wong said.
“We’ve seen a short-term rebound,” he said. “The question is what happens longer term — how will countries like China and Indonesia switch from export-dependent to something else? There are still lots of uncertainties about that.”
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS