If Thomas Siebel can accurately see the future, computer science students with the entrepreneurial gene may want to look for a different major. And investors who think that information technology (IT) is a sector that will produce outsized returns should wake up.
In Siebel’s view, IT is a mature industry that will grow no faster than the larger economy. He contends that its glory days are past — long past, having ended in 2000.
I believe that Siebel may well be wrong. But his own illustrious career in IT makes his opinions a matter of uncommon interest.
Earning both a master’s degree in computer science and an MBA at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, he was an executive at Oracle from 1984 to 1990. In 1993, he founded Siebel Systems, which sells software for tracking customers and sales prospects; the company was acquired in 2006 by Oracle, which paid almost US$6 billion. In Siebel’s self-deprecating narrative, he was simply standing in the right place at the right time.
Addressing Stanford students in February as a guest of the engineering school, Siebel called attention to 20 sweet years, from 1980 to 2000, when, he said, worldwide IT spending grew at a compounded annual growth rate of 17 percent.
“All you had to do was show up and not goof it up,” he said. “All ships were rising.”
Since 2000, however, that rate has averaged only 3 percent, he said. His explanation for the sharp decline is that “the promise of the post-industrial society has been realized.”
No new technological advances, he believes, would impel IT customers to replace the computer technology they already had.
“I would suggest to you that most of what’s going on today is not very exciting,” he said.
In his view, far larger opportunities are to be found in businesses that address needs in food, water, health care and energy. Though Silicon Valley was “where the action was” when he finished graduate school, he says, “if I were graduating today, I would get on a boat and I would get off in Shanghai.”
When I called him last month to discuss his provocative arguments, he was disarmingly modest.
“I’m just an old has-been, I don’t present myself as an expert in this or any other area,” he said.
The huge difference in growth rates, pre and post-2000, may seem so stark as to leave no room for an alternative view of IT’s prospects.
But the recent drop is not as steep as it seems at first. I asked Shane Greenstein, an economist at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, to take a look at the raw data upon which those numbers were supposedly based: the annual IT spending estimates published by IDC.
Greenstein’s calculations produced a more moderate compounded annual growth rate of 11.6 percent for 1980 to 2000, instead of 17 percent. (Siebel’s personal assistant said last week that the 17 percent in the Stanford talk came from a staff member who calculated from a reading of a chart, not from precise figures.)
When Greenstein looked at the full IDC data set, which goes back to 1961, and used other breakpoints to compare growth in earlier and later periods, he found that the most golden years of IT were in the 1960s, when use of mainframe computers spread widely. From 1961 to 1971, the compounded annual growth rate was 35.7 percent, more than three times the rate in the 1980 to 2000 period celebrated by Siebel.
Declining growth rates over time are to be expected, Greenstein said. After all, it doesn’t take many sales to show huge percentage gains when the base is small.
Timothy Bresnahan, a Stanford economist, similarly does not accept Siebel’s contention that the decline in growth rates this decade, which encompasses two recessions, signals a permanent end to IT’s record of growing faster than the larger economy.
“It is early days to say the game is over,” he said.
When the economy recovers, there is no dearth of unfinished projects for IT, he said, like “automating white-collar work and automating buying and selling in markets.”
And when one company dominates a certain area of technology, it can be a bottleneck along the road to innovation — an obstacle to the technology of others. Bresnahan says that this has happened with Microsoft in the PC side of corporate information technology, and in earlier times with IBM in computers and AT&T in telecommunications. But he said that entrepreneurial companies of those earlier days — like Siebel Systems — ultimately invented around bottlenecks and “innovation-led growth picked up again.”
The biggest decline in IT’s growth came at the end of the 1960s, well before Siebel’s own IT career. A fortune or two could still be made, it turns out. Siebel Systems, which its founder says attained US$2 billion in revenue annually in only seven years, was founded after the growth rate of IT spending dropped precipitously.
Entrepreneurial engineers in the US should take heart. There’s no cause for mass flight to Shanghai.
Randall Stross is a professor of business at San Jose State University in California.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past