The latest export orders and industrial production figures released on Thursday show that Taiwan is gradually building momentum in export-oriented growth. Economists said a much narrower decline in export orders last month from a year ago, together with solid improvement in industrial production, suggested that domestic manufacturers are increasing production as the economy appears to bottom out.
Other data released on Wednesday show that domestic trade also posted signs of recovery in all three categories — retail, wholesale and food/restaurant services — implying that the impact of the recession has begun to ease.
The latest data are not all promising, however. The recovery in export orders, industrial production and wholesale trade last month was hurt by a weakening rebound in retail sales and food/restaurant services.
In other words, while export-reliant manufacturers — especially in consumer electronics, information technology and machinery production — may be beginning to celebrate the green shoots of recovery, domestic-oriented firms are still finding themselves struggling with weak consumer demand.
The latest data present a picture of uneven development across the nation’s economic fundamentals and cast doubt on the sustainability of any recovery. Furthermore, consumer demand, which is necessary for sustainable recovery, is likely to remain subdued now that the latest unemployment figures, released on Wednesday, show the rate continuing to climb — to a record 5.94 percent last month.
With graduates entering the labor market, the jobless rate is certain to rise further in the next few months. Although government officials have said the labor market has started to stabilize because local companies are cutting fewer jobs, the fact is that the same companies remain reluctant to increase staff.
The situation has led the government to create short-term public sector jobs for the unemployed. It has also coordinated with private businesses to provide internships for college graduates.
But these are short-term solutions for stabilizing the labor market — and there are downsides to temporary offers. Companies need to see more concrete evidence of recovery and real growth in sales before they will want to hire new people. If there is no such evidence, then they will squeeze more work from existing employees as part of cost-cutting efforts.
Another downside is the persistence of long-term unemployment if job creation remains weak — even in the event that the economy begins to recover this year. Certain age groups are more likely to suffer, especially older age brackets.
Then there is worsening youth unemployment. Data suggest that one out of every six unemployed is a first-time job seeker, and that it took about eight months for fresh graduates to secure a job last month — higher than the average of six-and-a-half months in the first half of the year.
Even graduates who are fortunate to secure temporary jobs or internships this year will face uncertainties once their contracts expire. If they cannot find a job for an extended period of time or need to obtain new skills to survive in a more difficult job market, many will believe that the extra time they have devoted to their education will have been for nothing.
It will take some years for the job market to stabilize. In the meantime, long-term unemployment poses a real challenge to the nation’s economic competitiveness — and policymakers.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS