Media maggots hit new low
The desperation of Taiwan has sunk to a new low. Not only are the last 20-odd years of democratization being thrown on the scrap heap by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) media clout and island-wide patronage, but now the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is also seemingly falling over itself to contribute to this nation’s complete subjugation.
Notwithstanding the myriad falsehoods and pretentious “Taiwanese” claims of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), the DPP is also losing its grip on reality. Instead of challenging the KMT elite on substantive topics, the DPP continues to focus on non-issues that actually serve to denigrate the past and invite the KMT overlords to use their media might to erase the real injustices from history.
This is an absolute tragedy for a people with such a rich and meaningful history of their own. The most recent example is the pathetic DPP call for the release of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) (“DPP calls for release of Chen,” June 26, page 1). It was pathetic, because instead of highlighting the complete prejudice and oppression of the whole process and their ramifications, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) sees fit to fuel the fire of those KMT media bandits whose careers revolve around the daily blurring and obscuring of any issues of substance.
How idiotic to state in this context that Chen has “disappointed the public” and “failed to keep his family in line.”
What a load of nonsense. The proven facts to date are that after two failed attempts, the KMT summarily changed judges and have since kept the former president in incarceration without the slightest regard for fairness and justice.
This blatant political vendetta has brought the whole Republic of China judicial system into international disrepute and drawn much derision from legal experts, but Taiwanese themselves remain for the most part oblivious — for lamentably obvious reasons.
It is incumbent on the DPP to start focusing on the huge number of genuine matters of concern for authentic Taiwanese before it’s too late, and in doing so, not give unnecessary and unfounded credence to the spewings of those media maggots whose only goal is to make real issues farcical in order to preserve and entrench their and their masters’ unjust elitist status.
DAVID KAY
Taipei
Taiwan’s soul may be lost
An extremely important meeting of the Kaohsiung City Council’s Disciplinary Committee was scheduled to convene on Monday, April 20, at 3pm to discuss the case of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Kaohsiung City Councilor Huang Shao-ting (黃紹庭) who, like his nefarious and now infamous cohort former KMT legislator Diane Lee (李慶安), is alleged to possess dual citizenship — a felonious offense under Taiwan’s own Nationality Act (國籍法).
But to my great chagrin, and to the chagrin of many others, the meeting scheduled for April 20 had to be canceled when only two of the seven members on the Disciplinary Committee bothered to show up. More than two-thirds of the members boycotted the meeting, thus forcing its cancelation.
In my view, this constitutes a gross dereliction of duty. The meeting scheduled for April 20 was an extremely important one, the first meeting of its kind to have been scheduled in nearly a quarter of a century.
I can only wonder if by any chance the five members who failed to show up were KMT members, as are Lee and Huang.
The Taipei Times reported that the meeting of Kaohsiung City’s Disciplinary Committee hearing Huang’s case would have to be rescheduled for a later date (“Kaohsiung to reschedule meeting on citizenship row,” April 28, page 3).
Lamentably, no specific or precise date was given, only that it would hopefully be some time “later.”
More than two months have passed, but astonishingly enough, no one on this Disciplinary Committee has been able to reschedule a suitable date.
I find this snail’s pace all the more astounding when contrasted with the vigor and ardor exemplified by the opponents of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). Chen is incarcerated in a cell without even the benefit of a proper mattress.
His daughter is being tormented and humiliated to the point where her psychological welfare may be at risk. And now even her six-year-old son is the victim of an organized hate campaign. It seems that some people will not be satisfied until Chen and his entire family are destroyed.
Meanwhile, Lee and Huang act with impunity and go their merry way, knowing that their power, wealth and privileged status will protect them.
My advice to Taiwan is that the nation pay attention to its soul, because it in danger of being lost.
MICHAEL SCANLON
Connecticut, USA
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase