National Security Council Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起) has a problem.
First, his wife Chen Yue-ching (陳月卿) went on a book promotion tour to China. Now, his brother Su Yung-chin (蘇永欽) is set to take up a visiting professorship at Zhejiang University in Hangzhou.
Su’s wife and brother are not civil servants, so is harm inflicted if they travel to China on professional business? Are these matters of national security?
The Presidential Office says not.
The problem is that Su Chi is the man entrusted with maintaining national security — and defining its parameters. When members of his immediate and extended family travel to China for business or to teach while others are restricted from doing so, ordinary people have every right to be cynical if the government sits by and does nothing.
Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung’s (江丙坤) son was criticized for doing business in China — not least for probable conflict of interest. The fallout of this led President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to say that public sentiment must be taken into account — and Chiang almost left the SEF.
People close to former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) are suspected of conflict of interest. There are also concerns that KMT members participating in KMT-Chinese Communist Party negotiations are using the forum to advance their personal and financial interests.
After Chen’s book promotion in China embarrassed her husband and made trouble for the government, Ma said this kind of incident would “never happen again.” Yet the Presidential Office knew of Su Yung-chin’s offer from Zhejiang University before it became public and said nothing.
It seems neither a conflict of interest nor the perception of one is of concern to the Ma government — even on matters of national security — unless there is a sufficiently large backlash in the media.
Yet the feeling that basic principles of national security can be casually flouted may pose a challenge to Ma’s leadership as time goes on.
After KMT hack Hsu Shu-po (�?�) was allegedly promised the position of chairman of Taipei 101 in exchange for not running for Yunlin County commissioner, the Presidential Office sensed that the backlash would be too great — regardless of the truth of the matter — and might lead to legal action over inducement involving electoral processes. Within hours the Presidential Office told the Cabinet to withdraw the appointment.
But when Ma hinted at the possibility of KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung’s (吳伯雄) son taking the Taoyuan County commissioner’s post — just as Wu vacated his own post for the president — no one in the party suggested that inducement was involved.
Ma came to power partly on the understanding that he opposed the erosion of good governance, yet here we are, one year on, and a culture of privilege and hubris is being revitalized. In such a climate, even a responsible leader will struggle to look clean.
Su Yung-chin has an exceptional academic record — and is a former chairman of the National Communications Commission. He thus has many ways to make a living, which raises the question as to why he, like Su Chi’s wife, would go to China when he knew it would create problems for the president.
The answer is he and Su Chi’s wife knew it was highly likely they could do so without intervention — and that they might even be congratulated for their efforts.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the