The legislature recently passed amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), granting Chinese nationals married to Taiwanese the right to work in Taiwan as well as complete inheritance rights. The wait for Chinese spouses applying for citizenship has also been shortened from eight years to six years.
This stands as the government’s first human rights accomplishment since the legislature passed the Act Governing Execution of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (公民與政治權利國際公約及經濟社會文化權利國際公約施行法) in April.
Transnational immigration researchers have long acknowledged that legal immigrants should have the right to work and that residence requirements for citizenship applications should be shortened. Such preposterous and discriminatory regulations as an inheritance cap for people from particular countries are rare in the international community.
The government’s efforts to push the amendments only brought the nation a bit closer to meeting human rights standards, but this small step may symbolize the advent of new progress.
When the cross-strait relations act was established in 1992, not long after the lifting of Martial Law, Taiwan did not have a deep understanding of human rights and apprehended burgeoning cross-strait exchanges.
When it was in power, the Democratic Progressive Party based its political capital on animosity toward China and treated Chinese spouses like enemies.
Chinese spouses have been treated even worse than other foreign spouses.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) have repeatedly declared that all immigrants are treated equally. But the reality is very different.
Civil organizations have proposed to the legislature a more comprehensive version of the amendment to extend fair treatment to Chinese spouses, but it failed to gain government support.
If the government really wanted to revise discriminatory laws, why not amend more articles in the cross-strait relations act?
The legislature’s recent acceptance of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, an achievement proudly touted by the Ma government, offers a new opportunity for the government to further amend laws.
The covenant, for example, prohibits differential treatment based on national origin. The ban on discrimination based on national origin is an important human rights principle dismissed by Taiwan: When the government deals with immigration matters, it is not allowed to discrimination against people of different origin.
Taiwan, however, has dismissed this principle.
In accordance with the Act Governing Execution of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, government at all levels should amend all laws and regulations that violate the covenant within two years.
Discriminatory laws such as the Act Governing Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area must be amended.
The government’s sincerity in revising this act will show whether Taiwan measures up to the covenants and reveal the truth of Ma’s declarations.
Bruce Liao is an assistant law professor at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95