The legislature recently passed amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), granting Chinese nationals married to Taiwanese the right to work in Taiwan as well as complete inheritance rights. The wait for Chinese spouses applying for citizenship has also been shortened from eight years to six years.
This stands as the government’s first human rights accomplishment since the legislature passed the Act Governing Execution of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (公民與政治權利國際公約及經濟社會文化權利國際公約施行法) in April.
Transnational immigration researchers have long acknowledged that legal immigrants should have the right to work and that residence requirements for citizenship applications should be shortened. Such preposterous and discriminatory regulations as an inheritance cap for people from particular countries are rare in the international community.
The government’s efforts to push the amendments only brought the nation a bit closer to meeting human rights standards, but this small step may symbolize the advent of new progress.
When the cross-strait relations act was established in 1992, not long after the lifting of Martial Law, Taiwan did not have a deep understanding of human rights and apprehended burgeoning cross-strait exchanges.
When it was in power, the Democratic Progressive Party based its political capital on animosity toward China and treated Chinese spouses like enemies.
Chinese spouses have been treated even worse than other foreign spouses.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Mainland Affairs Council Chairwoman Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) have repeatedly declared that all immigrants are treated equally. But the reality is very different.
Civil organizations have proposed to the legislature a more comprehensive version of the amendment to extend fair treatment to Chinese spouses, but it failed to gain government support.
If the government really wanted to revise discriminatory laws, why not amend more articles in the cross-strait relations act?
The legislature’s recent acceptance of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, an achievement proudly touted by the Ma government, offers a new opportunity for the government to further amend laws.
The covenant, for example, prohibits differential treatment based on national origin. The ban on discrimination based on national origin is an important human rights principle dismissed by Taiwan: When the government deals with immigration matters, it is not allowed to discrimination against people of different origin.
Taiwan, however, has dismissed this principle.
In accordance with the Act Governing Execution of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, government at all levels should amend all laws and regulations that violate the covenant within two years.
Discriminatory laws such as the Act Governing Relations Between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area must be amended.
The government’s sincerity in revising this act will show whether Taiwan measures up to the covenants and reveal the truth of Ma’s declarations.
Bruce Liao is an assistant law professor at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the