The Computex trade show in Taipei focused a lot of attention on peripherals and consumer electronics as well as on the number of foreign buyers and business potential the event could generate.
But what made this year’s Computex different from previous ones was that buyers from emerging markets, especially from China, increased by a large number from last year, helping make up for a decline in attendees from other countries whose economies continue to suffer from the global economic downturn.
The participation of 45 Chinese companies this year and the record increase of 34 percent in Chinese visitors for the show was impressive. Yet what has caught even more attention from local businesses was Chinese purchasing power in the form of several trade delegations, encouraged by the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), which has aggressively pushed cross-strait rapprochement since taking office.
Last week, a Chinese trade delegation led by Li Shuilin (李水林), president of the Association for Trade and Economic Exchange Across the Taiwan Straits, placed orders with Taiwanese suppliers to procure US$827 million in products, mainly computers and consumer electronics, on top of a US$1.4 billion purchase of goods the delegation is expected to place by the end of the year.
Another Chinese delegation, led by Bai Weimin (白為民), secretary-general of the China Video Industry Association, said last week that Chinese color TV manufacturers would purchase US$4.4 billion in Taiwan-made flat panels this year, while a trade delegation from Guangxi Province purchased US$200 million in Taiwanese goods in the last week of May.
The arrivals of these delegations, along with more scheduled for later this year, come at a time when Taiwan’s economy is expected to contract by 4.25 percent this year amid weak domestic demand and falling exports. No wonder many businesses have pinned their hopes for prosperity on Chinese purchases.
As Taiwan still enjoys a huge trade surplus with China, Beijing’s sending more trade missions to Taipei will only widen that deficit. Therefore, aside from a gesture of goodwill to Taiwanese — as a means to reduce the reluctance of Taiwanese to interact with Chinese after years of military intimidation and political isolation — or to help bolster Ma’s policies, there is no point in Beijing continuing to send trade missions.
While growing cross-strait economic exchange and relaxation is a trend, the issue of Chinese procurement groups has raised concerns as to whether the Ma administration is capable of using the money earned from China to improve the nation’s infrastructure in terms of roads and harbor development, as well as medical care, education and the social safety network.
A major point of contention is whether the government will use the Chinese capital to strengthen Taiwan’s industrial competitiveness and enhance the domestic investment environment, or simply allow Taiwan’s economy to grow increasingly reliant on Chinese orders.
The Ma government has vowed to create prosperity for Taiwanese by integrating the country’s economy with China’s. But it should not solely focus on economic benefits while overlooking other developments in the social and political arenas.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS