The Korean Peninsula is experiencing one of its periodic bouts of extremism, this time marked by the suicide on May 22 of former South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun and North Korea’s second test of a nuclear device. Roh’s suicide is a disaster for his family and a national shame, while North Korean leader Kim Jong-il’s nuclear blast is something of a temper tantrum, but one that may have dire consequences for the two Koreas and the world.
The North Korean bomb, estimated at 4 kilotonnes, does not come anywhere near the magnitude of the atomic bombs of between 15 kilotonnes and 21 kilotonnes that the US dropped on Japan 64 years ago. Indeed, this vainglorious attempt by Kim Jong-il reminds Koreans of the mother bullfrog in Aesop’s Fables who puffed herself out to imitate an ox.
Yet North Korea’s world-defying belligerency is not utter madness. Rather, it is a by-product of its own acute fears of regime collapse.
As a Korean, I am always puzzled by Korean extremism. Where in the world can you find a more isolated, regimented and militarized dynastic mutation of a communist totalitarian system than in North Korea? Where on earth can you see a nuclear-armed, missile-shooting panhandler such as Kim Jong-il? Is there another country where only a father and his son have ruled like demigods for the last 61 years?
Likewise, where else but in South Korea can you find a Christian church whose registered membership runs upwards of 800,000, and where nearly 100,000 adherents attend each of the three Sunday services every week? Where else can you witness an ex-president commit suicide by jumping off a cliff near his residence? And this in a country that had an estimated per capita income of US$40 in the 1940s but has now become the world’s 12th or 13th-largest economy.
Cornelius Osgood, an American anthropologist, attributed Korean extremism to the peninsula’s weather. He observed that the Korean temperament is a product of long, harsh Siberian winters and hot, humid summers, with only short springs and autumns.
I believe, however, that Korean extremism stems from the country’s geography and history. Surrounded by hostile neighbors such as Chinese, Mongols and Manchus in the north and Japanese across the sea, Koreans have struggled tooth and nail for thousands of years to retain their ethnic, linguistic, cultural and political identity.
Setting the blame game aside, what can be done with North Korea? Unfortunately, putting the nuclear genie back in the bottle is next to impossible. The effectiveness of available options is limited, and all of them are pregnant with unpredictable political and military consequences.
“Economic strangulation” of North Korea appears to be the fallback option. Strengthening and tightening UN Security Council Resolution 1718, crafted in the wake of North Korea’s first nuclear test in October 2006, should be the immediate task. The Security Council is already at work drafting a new resolution. But to make the new resolution effective, China’s full and unwavering participation — which has not yet come about — is critical. Any unilateral measures against North Korea by individual countries must be executed within the broader framework of the new resolution.
Even if new sanctions are imposed, the door to the Six-Party Talks must be left open for Kim Jong-il. In this eyeball-to-eyeball situation, the other five parties in the talks — China, Japan, Russia, the US and South Korea — must not give in first to North Korea. At present, public opinion worldwide, particularly in South Korea and Japan, is highly volatile. A cooling-off period is necessary. Seeking dialogue with North Korea immediately after its missile tantrum and nuclear brinkmanship is unwise and impractical.
After tough and effective UN-led sanctions are imposed, the concerned parties must wait until the North feels the pain of the economic squeeze. But as North Korea is one of the world’s poorest and least globalized states, the effectiveness of sanctions will be limited.
At the same time, the nuclear threat is not the most immediate danger. The bigger threat today is actual combat, for the day after North Korea’s nuclear test, South Korea announced its full participation in the US-led Proliferation Strategic Initiative, which seeks to intercept ships that may be involved in illegally transporting nuclear technology. North Korea blasted this South Korean decision as a “declaration of war.” Great care and cool heads will be needed in the seas around Korea in the days and weeks to come.
Rising tension on the Korean Peninsula is shattering fast the glimmers of hope for re-unity that followed 10 years of progress under the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun governments. South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, through his flip-flops, and Kim Jong-il, with his renewed nuclear blackmail, both seem determined to see relations deteriorate.
Korea’s two leaders must not repeat the mistake of their predecessors in the latter part of the 19th century. Blinded by internecine domestic power struggles, they failed to see the great powers’ strategic gambits in the region. That failure led directly to the colonization of Korea by Japan.
Worsening inter-Korean relations will certainly make both sides less secure and stable — politically, economically and militarily. Caught in this vicious spiral, North and South Korea will become far more vulnerable to neighboring powers’ strategic maneuvers.
As a result, growing inter-Korean hostility may ultimately prove far more lethal to the well-being of all Koreans than Roh Moo-hyun’s tragic suicide and Kim Jong-il’s futile fireworks.
Yang Sung-chul is a distinguished professor at Korea University in Seoul and a former ambassador of the Republic of Korea to the US.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US