When President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) signed two UN human rights covenants on May 14, he invited all diplomats in Taipei to the signing ceremony except for the representative from Japan to punish him for remarks on the undetermined status of Taiwan.
There is no telling what will anger Ma because even though he dislikes talk about Taiwan’s undetermined status, it is a political fact. More importantly, this status is a frequently pursued diplomatic goal of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Assuming that the KMT really only accepted the idea that Taiwan belongs to the Republic of China (ROC), then they would have to refuse participation in every international event where they could not participate under the title of “ROC” and as a country. This has not happened.
Countries participate in the WHO as countries; observership is a non-governmental status. The KMT’s willingness to accept observer status was an affirmation of the undetermined status of Taiwan. By accepting “Chinese Taipei,” the Ma administration also appears to take the view that the nation’s title is undetermined.
However, the KMT have gone even further. When Taiwanese students studying in Geneva protested against the WHO listing Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Department of Health Minister Yeh Ching-chuan (葉金川) complained the protests would cause Taiwan to be seen as a “lowly country” and insisted that he opposed any protests. This amounted to a strong defense of Beijing’s position that Taiwan is a province of China, abandoning even the idea that Taiwan’s status is undetermined.
But in the WHO, Taiwan is not even a “lowly nation,” simply a local government. It is unbelievable that Yeh would take a seat at the World Health Assembly given this arrangement and that he would turn on Taiwanese students and defend Beijing’s view of Taiwan as a Chinese province.
Ma has shamelessly tried to divert attention from the serious conflict over whether Taiwan is a Chinese province to the issue of whether or not the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) accepts the title “Chinese Taipei.”
The KMT then blamed the DPP for Taiwan’s being listed as a Chinese province by saying that the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between China and the WHO was signed in 2005 when the DPP was in power. However, the DPP never accepted the MOU, while Ma is happy to take part in international events under these conditions.
With reference to the undetermined status of Taiwan, Ma has said that Taiwan is part of the ROC and that the sovereignty of the ROC rests with the people. These are big words, but can Ma tell us whether by “all the people” he means 23 million people or 1.4 billion people? Of course not, and that is another standard position of someone who subscribes to the view that Taiwan’s status is undetermined.
After the ROC withdrew from the UN, it was succeeded by the PRC. However, Taiwan’s status was never determined. I believe the view of the vast majority of Taiwanese is that although the title “ROC” is used in Taiwan, its status is undetermined, while “Taiwan” belongs to the Taiwanese and they do not accept the view that Taiwan’s status is undetermined.
This means that the theoretical foundation for Taiwan independence is not that its status is undetermined, but that it should be determined by its people according to the principle of self-determination.
The KMT’s stance, on the other hand, is that the status of China, the PRC, the ROC and Taiwan are all undetermined. This turns everything into a mess, that, if brought to light, would turn the KMT furious with shame.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US