In an interview with the Straits Times earlier this month, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said Taiwan and China would hold political talks in future. He later said his government would not discuss unification with China during his term in office. His apparent inconsistency is baffling not only for Taiwanese, but probably for China.
Unification must be the last topic on the cross-strait talks agenda. This is what Ma meant by his campaign proposal of “eventual unification.” Talks on unification must be preceded by negotiations on a whole range of economic and political issues.
It is the uncertainty over what will be discussed in these preparatory talks that the public finds worrying. After all, when all the preparations are done, discussing unification will be easy, regardless of who the negotiators are. At that point, it could be too late to change course.
Although Taiwan attended the World Health Assembly under the name “Chinese Taipei,” swine flu cases in this country are listed under China on the WHO Web site. The signs are there but Ma’s government fails to understand the danger it is facing.
Ma could finish integrating Taiwan’s economy with China’s while he is president. He may persuade China to stop aiming missiles at Taiwan and to sign a cross-strait peace accord. But as time goes by, the title of “Chinese Taipei” risks becoming the norm when referring to Taiwan. Beijing would regulate Taiwan’s diplomacy and the terms under which it can join international organizations.
Taiwan’s status would shift to from sovereign nation to that of Hong Kong and Macau. Taiwan’s relations with the US and Japan would become distant. Within Taiwan, the notion of “Greater China” would become customary. Taiwanese consciousness would gradually be eroded through changes in textbooks, the media, entertainment and the arts. After this course is firmly set, Ma would be able to retire from the scene, his job done. It will not matter who finally declares Taiwan’s unification with China, because it will be a fait accompli.
If former US president Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger had not first opened the door to China and set up the framework for US-China relations, it would have been hard for former US president Jimmy Carter to extend diplomatic recognition to Beijing. Carter trod the path laid out by his predecessors.
Similarly, no matter whether unification is completed under Ma or later, history will remember Ma as the one who paved the way. The question is, will he be praised or damned for it?
If Taiwan’s unification with China makes China more democratic and diverse, Ma will enjoy the praise and the credit. If Taiwan is absorbed into a China where the Chinese Communist Party retains its monopoly on power and human rights are routinely restricted or trampled then Ma’s name will live in infamy.
Whatever happens, Taiwanese must keep a close watch on Ma and his government and keep them in check. Only then can we be sure that Taiwan will not be served up as a dish of frogs legs for the Beijing leadership.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS