The first anniversary of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) term of office passed this week with Ma holding a series of press conferences to reflect upon the last 12 months.
While Ma appears to be satisfied with his first year in office, the report card on his first 365 days is a mixed bag, with success in some areas and utter failure in others.
The biggest achievements during his first year have been in an area where he focuses most of his attention — relations with China.
Ma has delivered on promises to improve relations, while opening air, sea and postal links. His promises concerning Chinese tourists have also come to fruition.
But while Ma has succeeded in reducing tension across the Taiwan Strait to a degree, doing so has come at a cost. Taiwan has all but halted attempts to reach out to the rest of the world.
Lausanne-based business school IMD’s 2008 competitiveness ranking saw Taiwan’s economy drop 10 places to No. 23.
Another concern is the improvement in relations with Beijing. An invitation to attend the World Health Assembly raises concerns that the government negotiated with Beijing in secret. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) continues to usurp government authority through contacts with the Chinese Communist Party, while none of the nine cross-strait agreements signed with China has been subject to legislative scrutiny.
Meanwhile, the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty has been buried, reduced to little more than word games with confusing and contradictory references to Taiwan, the Republic of China, “one China” and the fictional “1992 consensus” emanating from the Presidential Office.
In his inauguration speech last year, Ma said he would “rely on the Constitution to protect human rights, uphold law and order and make justice independent and impartial,” adding that “Taiwan’s democracy should not be marred by political interference in the media or electoral institutions.”
None of these promises has been delivered, with a series of well-documented incidents infringing upon human rights and the specter of state intervention in a number of institutions already apparent.
Ma’s promises to push environmental sustainability have turned out to be lip service, while morale in the military has plunged.
Ma’s biggest failure, however, has been where everybody’s hopes were the highest: the economy. Ma came to power on the back of his “6-3-3” promise: 6 percent annual GDP growth, less than 3 percent unemployment and per capita annual income of US$30,000. One year on, with almost 6 percent unemployment, negative growth and annual incomes shrinking, these figures are pie in the sky.
While the global economic crisis is responsible for the downturn in the nation’s economic fortunes, the crisis has exposed the “economic expertise” of the Ma administration as gravely inadequate.
Lacking substantial policies to reduce the effects of the crisis, the Cabinet predicts growth next quarter, saying that things will get better soon.
While officials may be upbeat about the economy, looking back over the last year, it is hard to be optimistic about much else.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS