Seconds from cracking
Dear Johnny,
The longer I stay in Taiwan, the more I feel like I’m living in 1984 (the novel, not the year).
It first started a few years ago with the “Two Minutes’ Hate” — the mindless vitriol of the red-shirted anti-Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) protesters. Later it was the bald-faced rewriting of history — the KMT are the defenders of clean government, don’t you know, and the PRC is, and has always been, our greatest friend and savior, and don’t you forget it.
Recently it has been getting worse. First was the election of our very own Big Brother (and surely it is no coincidence that you refer to him as Shuaige-in-Chief). Then came a string of doublethink that has my brain threatening to explode.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) claims, with a straight face, to be the president of the Republic of China, whose territory includes Mongolia and Tibet. Entering the World Health Assembly under the name “Chinese Taipei”? A “victory.” Agreeing to tightly integrate your economy with a country that reserves the right to blow us out of the water? A “win-win” situation. I look around, but I seem to be the only one laughing.
It goes on. When the Japanese ambassador states that Taiwan’s status is undecided — equivalent to saying “the sky is blue” — the KMT is up in arms. Huh? What have we been arguing about for the last 50 years if not the status of Taiwan?
But the kicker came this week when The Economist — The Economist! — suggested that everything is bright and sunny in the new Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere. I’m beginning to question my sanity. Honestly, the rat cage has been strapped to my face and I’m seconds from cracking.
I picture myself at some unspecified time in the future, sitting in a dirty little beef noodle shop, downing shots of cheap Victory Rice Wine. The wall sports the obligatory poster of a beatifically smiling Chairman Ma, hair blacker than ever, teeth whiter than ever, shorts shorter than ever. TVBS blares in the background about the ongoing Chen trial. Pearly White Terror agents hunch over their drinks in a dark corner.
“Yes,” I will say to myself, “the China Post [May 6, page 8] was right: Taipei residents are not Taiwanese because they live in Directly Administered Municipalities of the ROC. They may be located on Taiwan, but they are not “under” Taiwan. It all makes sense. Black is white. Freedom is slavery. And yes, I love Big Brother Ma.”
TEACHER BRIAN
Johnny replies: Your letter got me thinking. If your garden variety independence supporter, after having a tryst with his equivalent of Julia, gets arrested and is sent to Room 101 in the Ministry of Love (oh, how Taiwanese!), what will, for him, be the worst thing in the world?
The more I think about this question, the more terrified I am to find out the answer.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS