One short faxed letter from WHO Director-General Margaret Chan (陳馮富珍) inviting “Chinese Taipei” to participate in this month’s World Health Assembly (WHA) brought an end to 13 years of disappointment on Tuesday when Taiwan finally achieved its goal of representation at the WHO.
The government predictably patted itself on the back, attributing the watershed to its “modus vivendi” policy of not provoking China, and sought to demonstrate that it had not compromised Taiwan’s sovereignty to gain this achievement.
But at what cost was this “breakthrough” achieved?
The very fact that Taiwan had to be invited and was not admitted in the usual manner is the first cause for concern. The invitation came after secret negotiations last month between representatives from Taipei and Beijing. And while many in Taiwan will be pleased with the result, it is imperative that the government stick to its March 13 promise that it will release information at an appropriate time about how this was achieved.
Unlike China, Taiwan is a democracy, in which transparency is essential for accountability. The public needs to know if the government is — as it says — acting in their best interests and that this was not the result of more secretive meetings between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party.
People should not be content with reassurances that this is just the latest example of Beijing’s “goodwill” if such goodwill is conditional on the Taiwanese government considering itself part of China.
While “Chinese Taipei” may be an acceptable name to the government, to the rest of the world it implies that Taiwan is under Beijing’s heel.
The so-called increase in Taiwan’s international breathing space is nothing of the sort.
By becoming a non-state observer — China will not allow any other form of membership — and not a full member of the WHO, Taiwan puts itself in the same company as the Palestinian territories and the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.
It is far short of the stated goal of most Taiwanese: admission to the WHO as a member state. Is this how most of them view their country, and what they envisioned when they said they wanted meaningful participation?
Another problem is that the invitation only applies to this year. Fears that the invitation will need renewing on an annual basis seem to have been confirmed. This is a worrying development as it means Beijing will now have the ability to hold Taiwanese and their health concerns to a form of ransom. How long will it be before we start seeing election slogans such as “Vote KMT, stay in the WHA?”
While many people may be happy about what they see as the fruits of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) cross-strait labor, they may not be so ecstatic when they realize this government has pushed them another step toward unification.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS