Less than a month before the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting on May 18, the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) reportedly held clandestine talks with its Chinese counterpart in which Beijing agreed that Taiwan could participate in the WHA meeting as an observer under the name “Chinese Taipei.”
The Ma administration’s decision-making process has not been transparent. The government continues to prevaricate on reports that it held secret talks with China. China appears to be offering an olive branch by giving Taiwan the green light to participate in the WHA meeting. However, the public does not know what conditions Taiwan had to accept and what price it will have to pay for all this.
The Ma administration decided not to submit an application to the WHA through the nation’s diplomatic allies or on its own. Instead, it pleaded with China — for peace and reached a clandestine agreement with Beijing on the WHA issue. Opposition legislators and independence activists see this as a underground deal made by the Ma administration at the expense of Taiwanese sovereignty.
However, if Taiwan does not insist on applying for WHO membership as a sovereign state, it will not be able to participate in any WHO-related meeting or event under its actual name. Even if the government were to attend the WHA meeting as an observer under the name “Chinese Taipei,” it would not mean that Taiwan would be able to continue to participate in the meeting next year. Taiwan would still have to obtain approval from China before it could participate in the international health body.
China has employed the carrot-and-stick approach in dealing with Taiwanese affairs. On the one hand, Beijing gave “Chinese Taipei” some international space to perfunctorily meet the Taiwanese public’s demand for international participation.
On the other hand, Beijing continues to restrict Taiwan’s participation in most international events as part of its efforts to gradually undermine its international status and gain ultimate control. As soon as it becomes an accepted international norm that Chinese approval is a prerequisite for Taiwan’s participation in any global organization, every country will naturally view China as Taiwan’s suzerain, posing a serious challenge to Taiwan’s status as an independent, sovereign state.
The Ma administration’s secret talks with China on Taiwan’s participation in the WHA can be seen as an act of self-denigration. This is not simply a technical negotiation but one involving the nation’s sovereignty and security. Preserving this sovereignty is crucial to Taiwan’s survival. Active supervision of the government is imperative, and the public should demand that the Ma administration disclose the contents of its talks with China to make the decision-making process transparent. Only then will we be able to say that Taiwanese sovereignty and interests have not been sold out.
Chen Lung-chu is president of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS