Much has been said of the potential for Taiwan’s democracy to have an impact on China as exchanges between the two countries increase. The experience that Chinese visitors take home from Taiwan after observing its open society and freedoms has been touted as part of the nation’s soft power. With the recent boost in cross-strait tourism, the potential for a gradual transfer of values is increasing.
Peaceful protests like those organized by Falun Gong practitioners at sites frequented by Chinese tourists have a role to play if Taiwan hopes to demonstrate the benefits of living in a stable democracy. Falun Gong followers seeking to draw attention to the brutal oppression of their spiritual movement in China have increased their presence at popular tourist spots since the launch of weekly cross-strait charter flights last summer, drawing complaints from some and praise from others.
Authorities in some areas are challenged with how to avoid offending Chinese tourists and losing their business without infringing on Falun Gong practitioners’ rights to freedom of speech and assembly.
The Sun Moon Lake National Scenic Area Administration used regulations on advertisements to keep Falun Gong practitioners from hanging up banners aimed at catching the attention of cross-strait tourists and educating them about religious repression in China, although Falun Gong followers continue to protest there.
In Tainan, city officials came under fire last June for allegedly seeking to clear away Falun Gong practitioners from a site that was to be visited by Chinese tourism officials. The debate flared again after the Tourism Bureau said it wanted to avoid meetings between Chinese tourists and protesting Falun Gong followers — regardless of whether their activities were peaceful and legal.
While some complaints from visitors may be valid — including the argument that images displayed by the Falun Gong are too graphic for children — these concerns can be conveyed to protesters without seeking to end their efforts to communicate with cross-strait tourists.
Opening the eyes of people who have been force-fed propaganda from an early age is no simple task, as the Taiwanese themselves can attest to. But while Taiwan has transformed over the past decades, the Chinese public is still taught by an authoritarian government that patriotism and good citizenship entail keeping quiet in the face of government abuses. Beijing continues to crack down on demonstrations, regardless of whether they are peaceful and based on valid complaints.
Even those who turn to the country’s petition system to seek redress for wrongs by government authorities are seen as a threat and portrayed as troublemakers or mentally ill.
While in Taiwan, Chinese visitors will hopefully witness that peaceful activities labeled “dangerous” by their government can exist in a stable society. The goal is to implant the seeds of free thought in visitors who, upon returning home, may wonder why they are denied the same right to criticize their government.
Tourism authorities in Taiwan, meanwhile, must remember that Falun Gong practitioners have the right to protest oppression in China, while Chinese tourists do not have a right to be shielded from opinions they might find unpalatable.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS