Real heroes of democracy
During recent activities commemorating the 100th anniversary of the birth of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), news media quoted President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) as saying the events honored Chiang’s contribution to Taiwan’s political and democratic reforms. These events staged by Ma and his diehard KMT followers give the impression they wish they could rewrite history.
My reading of history and perhaps that of many other Taiwanese are quite different from Ma’s account. It is easy for us to see why Ma has been and still is so grateful to Chiang, who groomed Ma to be a future leader. Who wouldn’t be grateful to their benefactors?
But history shows that Chiang and his father, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), imposed martial law for nearly four decades to silence critics and political opponents. It was during Chiang Ching-kuo’s presidency in 1984 that Henry Liu (劉宜良), a journalist critical of the Chiang Ching-kuo regime, was assassinated in his home in Daly City, California. It appears that Ma was a silent witness who made no protest.
In fact, Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo were the most ruthless and monstrous dictators the nation has ever experienced. In my opinion, they are just as evil as former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, if not more so.
He killed his own people in peacetime, but Saddam’s Baath party is no more, while Chiang Ching-kuo’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) continues to prosper.
During the Martial Law era, Chiang Kai-shek and Chiang Ching-kuo kept Taiwan in line through a policy of terror, systematic arrest, imprisonment and execution of prominent intellectuals and professionals who were the potential leaders for a democratic movement.
The democratic aspirations of Taiwanese were held back for more than four decades until former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) took power. I consider him to be the true reformer that led Taiwan to become a democratic country.
The recent unexpected discovery of files related to political persecution during the White Terror era at the Ankang Guesthouse is quite an eye opener for the whole world to see. I am sure many KMT members, Ma included perhaps, wish these files were long gone so they could continue to deny political persecution during this period ever happened. (“Ankang files should be archived,” April 6, page 8)
If Ma is truly committed to democratic principles, he should appoint an independent commission to find out the truth behind his party’s past sins, and safeguard and preserve the files, so the people who sacrificed their lives for democracy get some comfort in their death.
Ankang Guesthouse should also be turned into some kind of memorial museum to house the files and other personal items, so the public has a chance to visit and learn about the history of Taiwan’s struggle for democracy.
KRIS LIAO
San Francisco, California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with