For decades, the “three Gs” have been a defining feature of the US political landscape. Guns, God and gays have been reliable hot-button issues constantly used to fire up Republicans and lambaste Democrats.
But there are signs now of a fundamental shift away from the so-called “culture wars” that have raged across American public life since at least the 1970s. In his first two months in office, US President Barack Obama has moved forward on a series of controversial issues and yet his popularity has barely suffered.
The president has taken a stand against anti-abortion rules in clinics and legalized funding for stem cell research. He has praised Islam and Iran on his recent overseas trip and held a Passover ceremony in the White House. Meanwhile, a series of states, including Iowa, deep in the American heartland, have legalized gay marriage and more are expected to follow suit.
Yet, for all the sound and fury this has prompted on the extreme right, Obama remains a popular president. That has led some to wonder if the culture wars are finally losing some of their power.
“People are tired of this. A lot of them are thinking: Let’s move on,” said professor Shaun Bowler, a political scientist at the University of California, Riverside.
Certainly that has been Obama’s strategy. His public stance has been one of reaching out to Republicans on major legislation. Such moves have often been rebuffed, but even so he went as far as keeping former president George W. Bush’s secretary of defense, Robert Gates, in his job at the Pentagon. In one recent poll, Obama — though still unpopular with Republicans — saw his approval rating tick up from 59 percent to 61 percent. Another had his rating attaining a healthy 66 percent.
Experts believe it is the economic crisis that is largely responsible for the failure of Republicans to make any headway by trying to attack using the “three Gs.” In tough times, fear of losing one’s job and home far outweighs the cultural issues that have previously dominated American politics. Americans are just too afraid of the collapsing economy to pay much attention to things that have no material impact on them.
“When you are losing your home, what do you care if two guys in Iowa can now wear a frock and get married,” Bowler said.
There are other things going on, too, beyond the simple fact of the worst recession since the Great Depression. Many believe there is a generational shift going on in the US, as young voters come of age having grown up more tolerant of issues such as homosexuality and gay marriage. For these voters the culture wars seem a relic of the past. There is also a slight slip in the number of Americans identifying themselves as Christian, down 10 points over the past 20 years.
“There is some generational change, especially in Christian conservative circles. That perhaps is contributing to the diminution [of the culture wars],” said Corwin Smidt, a specialist on religion in politics at Calvin University and author of the book Religion and the Culture Wars.
Even in many religious circles — and these include the powerful evangelical movement — there is a growing engagement with other issues such as the environment, aid in the developing world and combating HIV. Obama has actively cultivated his own religious image and courted powerful evangelical leaders such as Pastor Rick Warren, who spoke at Obama’s inauguration. The decision to court Warren’s approval outraged many gay activists, but Obama’s team ignored their protests in favor of carving out the middle ground.
Yet there is a powerful wing of the Republican party that is refusing to let go of the culture wars. Led by right-wing media figures such as Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, they have sought to portray Obama as a socialist-in-waiting and a danger to US democracy. They have painted him as pro-gay, anti-religious and anti-US.
One Republican congresswoman, Michele Bachmann from Minnesota, even claimed last week that Obama planned to set up “re-education camps” for young Americans to be brainwashed in political correctness. But the impact of such extreme talk appears to have had little effect on ordinary Americans and served only to inflame conservatives who were already anti-Obama. Indeed, much of it has become fodder for jokes on late-night TV chat shows rather than serious political debate.
Against a background of moderate Democratic moves — such as deciding not to move forward on anti-gun legislation — the Republican party seems to be moving further to the right at a time when the American public rewards those politicians who play to the center. Increasingly the party is seen as retreating to its core support of white southerners, which few experts see as a path to power.
“In the future, they will need to expand their base in some form,” Smidt said.
The move toward moderation and toleration in the era of Obama seems to have been typified by Iowa. The fact that the farm-belt state, often cited as an example of “heartland values,” has moved forward on gay marriage is seen as a sign that the culture wars’ fire and fury is abating.
Certainly Steven Thrasher, a gay writer based in New York, sees it that way.
“A lot of people found that the reaction to this happening in Iowa was minimal. Their bluff was being called,” Thrasher said.
Iowa’s move was doubly poignant for him as the child of a biracial couple who married in Iowa in 1958 because the state allowed such unions at a time when many others would not.
“One hopes that some day, throughout the nation, gay marriages, like my parents’ union, will just be seen as marriages,” he said.
In some ways Thrasher is typical of the new, more varied form of politics in the US that is breaking down old barriers. He is half-white, half-black, gay and also an active member of his Christian church. For many people, the simplistic old-style arguments of the culture wars are struggling to resonate in the face of such complexity.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s