On March 18, media revealed that a large quantity of materials related to political cases from the 1950s White Terror, as well as ordinary criminal cases, had been uncovered at the Investigation Bureau’s investigation center, known as the “Ankang Guesthouse” (安康招待所) in the Ankeng (安坑) area in Taipei County’s Xindian City. The discovery came as a shock to everyone who cares about transitional justice and the history of Taiwan’s struggle for democracy. The Ankang Guesthouse case is, however, merely the tip of the iceberg.
Most of the cases of political persecution under the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) authoritarian regime that have been made public are cases that had already been turned over to military courts. There are very few records of what happened at the pre-trial stages of arrest, interrogation and extraction of confessions. This most important piece of the puzzle has been missing for those attempting to find out the truth about what happened during the White Terror era.
As many of the departments concerned have been reorganized or disbanded over the years, their records are now distributed among various agencies. For example, files from the former Secrecy Bureau of the Ministry of National Defense (MND), which was responsible for investigating cases related to the underground communist Taiwan Province Work Committee in 1949 and the early 1950s, are now in the hands of Department No. 4 of the Investigation Bureau under the Ministry of Justice. Those of the former Peace Preservation Department under the Police Headquarters, which handled political cases besides those related to the Taiwan Province Work Committee, may have been handed over to the Intelligence Department of the Coast Guard Administration, and then given to the Reserve Command, and so on.
Considering this state of affairs, the National Archives Administration (NAC), which is the central government agency with overall responsibility for public records, is the department best suited for finding and collecting all records of political cases, wherever they may be.
The Archives Act (檔案法) stipulates that files may be marked for permanent or fixed-period archiving. Files designated for permanent archiving must be handed over to the NAC for preservation as state archives. Those marked for fixed-period archiving may be destroyed at the end of the designated storage period, but first they are supposed to be collated and sent to be checked by the NAC.
However, many people doubt whether the NAC is really able to ensure that other departments catalog their files in the proper detailed manner. Moreover, it is up to the various departments themselves to decide how long files must be kept. If the people in charge of intelligence agencies fail to recognize the value of these historical documents, they may mark them for fixed-period archiving, in which case they are likely to be destroyed when the time is up. If that happens, organizations and individuals who seek to probe the truth about how Taiwan was governed in the past will draw a blank. Once lost, the records can never be replaced.
To ensure the preservation of these records, the NAC should quickly instruct all departments that were ever responsible for investigating political cases or collecting political intelligence to check their own records of such cases, as well as files that may have been passed on to them by departments that no longer exist, and to mark all such files for permanent archiving. Departments that should be notified include the Investigation Bureau under the Ministry of Justice (MOJ), the Military Intelligence Department under the Reserve Command, the National Security Bureau, the Presidential Office, the Judge Advocates Bureau and General Political Warfare Bureau under the Ministry of National Defense, the Military Police Command, the National Police Administration under the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
There is another problem. Some of these government departments are still responsible for investigating political matters. Officials in charge of such departments often refuse to declassify files about political cases or hand them over to the NAC, basing their refusal on the National Intelligence Services Act (國家情報工作法). These conflicts of interest should be resolved through political consultation. For example, the president could issue instructions to the MND, and the premier to the MOJ to facilitate declassification of political case records. The NAC should set out more complete guidelines to provide researchers with more open access to these records, giving adequate attention to the privacy of concerned individuals on the one hand and the search for historical truth on the other.
Following the Ankang Guest House discovery, there have been reports in the media that the NAC and the Investigation Bureau will give a report on the incident at the Legislative Yuan. However, as we have seen, the task of collecting documents involves many different departments, so it cannot be done by the Legislative Yuan’s Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, the NAC or any other agency acting alone. All the departments that have files relating to political cases in their possession must recognize that in today’s democratic Taiwan these documents are the common property of the whole nation.
We call on the KMT and the government to do all they can to get these files declassified. After all, Taiwan has come a long way in modernizing its intelligence agencies and bringing them under the control of the state instead of one political party or leader, as in the past. Besides, fewer and fewer of the people involved are still alive, so declassifying the files will not have any great negative impact on living individuals. If the task of declassifying these files and making them public can be completed within the term of the current KMT government, it would be the clearest indication that Taiwan is now a mature democracy.
Yeh Hung-ling is executive secretary of the Taiwan Association for Truth and Reconciliation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS