The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) seems to be running out of luck following its defeat in a legislative by-election in Miaoli County on Saturday. Miaoli has long been a KTM stronghold, so it came as a surprise that the by-election was won by Kang Shih-ju (康世儒), who quit the party to run as an independent. The result marks an end to the series of election successes the KMT has enjoyed since 2005 and should serve as a warning to party leaders.
Saturday’s by-election was the first since Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) became president, so it could be viewed as a touchstone of public opinion toward his administration’s performance.
Taiwan’s import and export trade figures have dropped by between 30 percent and 40 percent since Ma took office. GDP is falling, unemployment climbing and many workers are on unpaid leave. The gloomy outlook is in stark contrast to Ma’s “6-3-3” campaign pledges — 6 percent annual economic growth, annual per capita income of US$30,000 by 2016 and unemployment below 3 percent.
The downturn may be global, but some figures show Taiwan’s economy sinking faster than its Asian neighbors. Ma and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) claim to be satisfied with their administration’s performance despite a series of policy bungles. No wonder voters have shown their discontent with the KMT.
Ma’s prescription for Taiwan’s sluggish economy is to accelerate the opening of cross-strait exchanges by signing an economic cooperation framework agreement with China. However, the government has failed to consult with the public, and there are worries that cheap Chinese products and labor may worsen the slump in Taiwan’s agriculture and industry. Miaoli, an agricultural county, is all the more sensitive to the potential impact of Chinese imports.
The KMT’s smug attitude is another reason for its election loss. The KMT assumed that factional support in Miaoli would always be to its advantage, but this time the factions shifted in Kang’s favor. KMT candidate Chen Luan-ying (陳鑾英) is the wife of Lee E-tin (李乙廷), who lost his legislative seat over vote buying and made the by-election necessary. With arrogant disregard for public opinion, the KMT put forward a tainted candidate and voters said “enough is enough.”
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) knew it would be a mistake to put forward a weak candidate. The KMT could use former DPP president Chen Shui-bian’s trial on corruption charges to divert public attention away from local issues. The DPP would certainly lose such a contest, causing another blow to its already low morale. So, instead of proposing its own candidate, the DPP backed Kang.
Miaoli is an electoral desert for the DPP, but on this occasion its support for Kang helped strike a blow against the KMT. If the DPP adopts a similar strategy in county and city-level elections at the end of this year, the KMT may yet be unseated in some of its traditional strongholds.
The by-election result has been a slap in the face for the KMT and has shaken its monopoly on power. Miaoli’s voters have told the KMT in no uncertain terms that they can’t be relied on to vote for the party when its performance, policies and candidate are not good enough. Late this month another by-election will be held, this time in Taipei City’s Da-an District. Da-an is also a KMT stronghold, but this by-election was brought about by former KMT legislator Diane Lee’s (李慶安) resignation after she was found to have dual nationality. This puts the KMT at a disadvantage. If the KMT fails to learn the lesson from its defeat in Miaoli, it might lose its footing in Da-an, too.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of