Habitually dressed in a long black abaya, with a veil placed firmly against her cheek, Shaikha Sabeeka bin Ibrahim al-Khalifa, the wife of the king of Bahrain, does not conform to the usual image of a political activist. Neither does Suzanne Mubarak, the demure, whippet-thin wife of Egypt's long-standing leader, Hosni Mubarak.
Yet last week, at a trail-blazing international conference in Bahrain, both these women delivered a stark message that polite Arab society never wanted to hear. Mubarak and Sabeeka warned of the blight of “sexual slavery,” “trafficking,” “child exploitation,” “prostitution” and “rape” in the Middle East. As they spoke, the front row of robed and mostly bearded men listened in silence. Once they had finished, there was a standing ovation. The two first ladies had not only broken the veil of silence on the human trafficking trade, they had coerced and charmed the assembled crowd of regional politicians, businessmen, judges and tycoons into taking action, and finally they had opened the door to discussing another taboo.
“It's all about changing mindsets,” Mubarak said matter-of-factly. “We have to break barriers, we have to break a lot of things that we have been silent about. We have to work across so many different levels of taboos. And we are, you know. Subtly and quietly we are changing a lot.”
It is nearly seven years since Mubarak set up the Arab Women Organization, a body founded with the express purpose of empowering women in a part of the world where entrenched tribal and religious codes would seem to defy that aim. Since that time, the role and profile of the First Ladies of the Arab world has become one of the most intriguing developments in societies not known for their commitment to feminist agendas.
Few in the West have heard of the group. But out of 22 Arab countries, the first ladies of 15 — Jordan, the Emirates, Bahrain, Tunisia, Algeria, Sudan, Syria, Oman, Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco and Yemen — have signed up. And, there are “tremendous hopes” that others will enroll.
“Some of the more traditional societies have not joined and these are the ones we are trying to get on board,” Mubarak said. “People could think, ‘Ah, first ladies, what can they do?’ But all of us share the same culture, the same language and very similar problems. And we’re aware of the needs of society, we know what we’re talking about and we’re in a position to be role models.”
And do they, I ask, talk of such things with their husbands?
“Of course we do, because they are issues that affect the whole of society,” she said.
“These women are pushing the envelope. They're talking about politically sensitive issues and bringing on board an army of different players to address them,” said Zohreh Tabatabai, communications director at the Geneva-based International Labour Organization.
The rise of the first ladies has been mirrored by the recent headway women have made across the Arab world. Even in the conservative oil-rich Gulf, girls are making headway. In countries like Bahrain, where women were given the vote only seven years ago, females now outnumber men in holding degrees.
“Admitting to your problems is the first step to solving them,” said Sabeeka, revealing immaculately coiffed, thick hennaed hair as she allows her veil to drop around her shoulders. “The image of Arab women in the West, that we are just princesses in a golden cage, with no rights, no choice, no brains and no education, is a challenge. It's totally wrong and I really want to correct it.”
Mild-mannered, progressive and with an impressive command of English, the 60-year-old royal, the first of King Hamad’s four wives, is the antithesis of what Bahrainis have ever known. Until her husband took power in 2002, nobody in Bahrain had actually heard of a first lady, much less seen her. But emboldened by Mubarak and other first ladies who have tackled subjects that have long lain dormant on government agendas — starting with divorce and genital mutilation — Sabeeka has forged ahead with critical reforms in her position as head of the newly established Supreme Council for Women.
As in other states, the policies have challenged the ossified Arab system, surprising diplomats who speak of the “phenomenon” of first ladies who now push ahead with social policies in a way their autocratic husbands never would.
“We’re way behind the curve in grasping what is emerging in the Middle East in terms of female power, and we underestimate the results that these women leaders are achieving,” said Scilla Elworthy, a leading authority in conflict prevention, whose Oxford Research Group has been nominated for the Nobel Prize three times. “It's taken them some time to gain traction but they’re producing model legislation and ensuring it is implemented. They've gone from chastity belts to contraception in 10 years — it took us 800 years to do that.”
Egypt's status in the Arab world has inevitably helped Mubarak, at 68 widely seen as the doyenne of the first ladies.
“Suzanne Mubarak has been at the forefront of women's empowerment in the region for years,” one Western official said. “She is fiercely independent and gets things done. Her husband may be one thing but she is another and we are watching her closely.”
But it is also Mubarak’s immense powers of persuasion that, in concentrating minds, have helped break the mold. Eloquent in a way that her husband isn’t, her mother was Welsh and fluency in English is another asset in her diplomatic efforts.
“I still have cousins [in Britain],” she said. “I am comfortable in both cultures, in both languages, in both worlds, and that helps. And that's what I would like for the Arab world, for children from a very early age to start appreciating other cultures, to start understanding there is richness in our diversity. Yes, there is a movement of Islamic conservatism and it is on the rise. But women have earned rights and it is now up to them to defend them.”
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS