Habitually dressed in a long black abaya, with a veil placed firmly against her cheek, Shaikha Sabeeka bin Ibrahim al-Khalifa, the wife of the king of Bahrain, does not conform to the usual image of a political activist. Neither does Suzanne Mubarak, the demure, whippet-thin wife of Egypt's long-standing leader, Hosni Mubarak.
Yet last week, at a trail-blazing international conference in Bahrain, both these women delivered a stark message that polite Arab society never wanted to hear. Mubarak and Sabeeka warned of the blight of “sexual slavery,” “trafficking,” “child exploitation,” “prostitution” and “rape” in the Middle East. As they spoke, the front row of robed and mostly bearded men listened in silence. Once they had finished, there was a standing ovation. The two first ladies had not only broken the veil of silence on the human trafficking trade, they had coerced and charmed the assembled crowd of regional politicians, businessmen, judges and tycoons into taking action, and finally they had opened the door to discussing another taboo.
“It's all about changing mindsets,” Mubarak said matter-of-factly. “We have to break barriers, we have to break a lot of things that we have been silent about. We have to work across so many different levels of taboos. And we are, you know. Subtly and quietly we are changing a lot.”
It is nearly seven years since Mubarak set up the Arab Women Organization, a body founded with the express purpose of empowering women in a part of the world where entrenched tribal and religious codes would seem to defy that aim. Since that time, the role and profile of the First Ladies of the Arab world has become one of the most intriguing developments in societies not known for their commitment to feminist agendas.
Few in the West have heard of the group. But out of 22 Arab countries, the first ladies of 15 — Jordan, the Emirates, Bahrain, Tunisia, Algeria, Sudan, Syria, Oman, Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco and Yemen — have signed up. And, there are “tremendous hopes” that others will enroll.
“Some of the more traditional societies have not joined and these are the ones we are trying to get on board,” Mubarak said. “People could think, ‘Ah, first ladies, what can they do?’ But all of us share the same culture, the same language and very similar problems. And we’re aware of the needs of society, we know what we’re talking about and we’re in a position to be role models.”
And do they, I ask, talk of such things with their husbands?
“Of course we do, because they are issues that affect the whole of society,” she said.
“These women are pushing the envelope. They're talking about politically sensitive issues and bringing on board an army of different players to address them,” said Zohreh Tabatabai, communications director at the Geneva-based International Labour Organization.
The rise of the first ladies has been mirrored by the recent headway women have made across the Arab world. Even in the conservative oil-rich Gulf, girls are making headway. In countries like Bahrain, where women were given the vote only seven years ago, females now outnumber men in holding degrees.
“Admitting to your problems is the first step to solving them,” said Sabeeka, revealing immaculately coiffed, thick hennaed hair as she allows her veil to drop around her shoulders. “The image of Arab women in the West, that we are just princesses in a golden cage, with no rights, no choice, no brains and no education, is a challenge. It's totally wrong and I really want to correct it.”
Mild-mannered, progressive and with an impressive command of English, the 60-year-old royal, the first of King Hamad’s four wives, is the antithesis of what Bahrainis have ever known. Until her husband took power in 2002, nobody in Bahrain had actually heard of a first lady, much less seen her. But emboldened by Mubarak and other first ladies who have tackled subjects that have long lain dormant on government agendas — starting with divorce and genital mutilation — Sabeeka has forged ahead with critical reforms in her position as head of the newly established Supreme Council for Women.
As in other states, the policies have challenged the ossified Arab system, surprising diplomats who speak of the “phenomenon” of first ladies who now push ahead with social policies in a way their autocratic husbands never would.
“We’re way behind the curve in grasping what is emerging in the Middle East in terms of female power, and we underestimate the results that these women leaders are achieving,” said Scilla Elworthy, a leading authority in conflict prevention, whose Oxford Research Group has been nominated for the Nobel Prize three times. “It's taken them some time to gain traction but they’re producing model legislation and ensuring it is implemented. They've gone from chastity belts to contraception in 10 years — it took us 800 years to do that.”
Egypt's status in the Arab world has inevitably helped Mubarak, at 68 widely seen as the doyenne of the first ladies.
“Suzanne Mubarak has been at the forefront of women's empowerment in the region for years,” one Western official said. “She is fiercely independent and gets things done. Her husband may be one thing but she is another and we are watching her closely.”
But it is also Mubarak’s immense powers of persuasion that, in concentrating minds, have helped break the mold. Eloquent in a way that her husband isn’t, her mother was Welsh and fluency in English is another asset in her diplomatic efforts.
“I still have cousins [in Britain],” she said. “I am comfortable in both cultures, in both languages, in both worlds, and that helps. And that's what I would like for the Arab world, for children from a very early age to start appreciating other cultures, to start understanding there is richness in our diversity. Yes, there is a movement of Islamic conservatism and it is on the rise. But women have earned rights and it is now up to them to defend them.”
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS