Habitually dressed in a long black abaya, with a veil placed firmly against her cheek, Shaikha Sabeeka bin Ibrahim al-Khalifa, the wife of the king of Bahrain, does not conform to the usual image of a political activist. Neither does Suzanne Mubarak, the demure, whippet-thin wife of Egypt's long-standing leader, Hosni Mubarak.
Yet last week, at a trail-blazing international conference in Bahrain, both these women delivered a stark message that polite Arab society never wanted to hear. Mubarak and Sabeeka warned of the blight of “sexual slavery,” “trafficking,” “child exploitation,” “prostitution” and “rape” in the Middle East. As they spoke, the front row of robed and mostly bearded men listened in silence. Once they had finished, there was a standing ovation. The two first ladies had not only broken the veil of silence on the human trafficking trade, they had coerced and charmed the assembled crowd of regional politicians, businessmen, judges and tycoons into taking action, and finally they had opened the door to discussing another taboo.
“It's all about changing mindsets,” Mubarak said matter-of-factly. “We have to break barriers, we have to break a lot of things that we have been silent about. We have to work across so many different levels of taboos. And we are, you know. Subtly and quietly we are changing a lot.”
It is nearly seven years since Mubarak set up the Arab Women Organization, a body founded with the express purpose of empowering women in a part of the world where entrenched tribal and religious codes would seem to defy that aim. Since that time, the role and profile of the First Ladies of the Arab world has become one of the most intriguing developments in societies not known for their commitment to feminist agendas.
Few in the West have heard of the group. But out of 22 Arab countries, the first ladies of 15 — Jordan, the Emirates, Bahrain, Tunisia, Algeria, Sudan, Syria, Oman, Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco and Yemen — have signed up. And, there are “tremendous hopes” that others will enroll.
“Some of the more traditional societies have not joined and these are the ones we are trying to get on board,” Mubarak said. “People could think, ‘Ah, first ladies, what can they do?’ But all of us share the same culture, the same language and very similar problems. And we’re aware of the needs of society, we know what we’re talking about and we’re in a position to be role models.”
And do they, I ask, talk of such things with their husbands?
“Of course we do, because they are issues that affect the whole of society,” she said.
“These women are pushing the envelope. They're talking about politically sensitive issues and bringing on board an army of different players to address them,” said Zohreh Tabatabai, communications director at the Geneva-based International Labour Organization.
The rise of the first ladies has been mirrored by the recent headway women have made across the Arab world. Even in the conservative oil-rich Gulf, girls are making headway. In countries like Bahrain, where women were given the vote only seven years ago, females now outnumber men in holding degrees.
“Admitting to your problems is the first step to solving them,” said Sabeeka, revealing immaculately coiffed, thick hennaed hair as she allows her veil to drop around her shoulders. “The image of Arab women in the West, that we are just princesses in a golden cage, with no rights, no choice, no brains and no education, is a challenge. It's totally wrong and I really want to correct it.”
Mild-mannered, progressive and with an impressive command of English, the 60-year-old royal, the first of King Hamad’s four wives, is the antithesis of what Bahrainis have ever known. Until her husband took power in 2002, nobody in Bahrain had actually heard of a first lady, much less seen her. But emboldened by Mubarak and other first ladies who have tackled subjects that have long lain dormant on government agendas — starting with divorce and genital mutilation — Sabeeka has forged ahead with critical reforms in her position as head of the newly established Supreme Council for Women.
As in other states, the policies have challenged the ossified Arab system, surprising diplomats who speak of the “phenomenon” of first ladies who now push ahead with social policies in a way their autocratic husbands never would.
“We’re way behind the curve in grasping what is emerging in the Middle East in terms of female power, and we underestimate the results that these women leaders are achieving,” said Scilla Elworthy, a leading authority in conflict prevention, whose Oxford Research Group has been nominated for the Nobel Prize three times. “It's taken them some time to gain traction but they’re producing model legislation and ensuring it is implemented. They've gone from chastity belts to contraception in 10 years — it took us 800 years to do that.”
Egypt's status in the Arab world has inevitably helped Mubarak, at 68 widely seen as the doyenne of the first ladies.
“Suzanne Mubarak has been at the forefront of women's empowerment in the region for years,” one Western official said. “She is fiercely independent and gets things done. Her husband may be one thing but she is another and we are watching her closely.”
But it is also Mubarak’s immense powers of persuasion that, in concentrating minds, have helped break the mold. Eloquent in a way that her husband isn’t, her mother was Welsh and fluency in English is another asset in her diplomatic efforts.
“I still have cousins [in Britain],” she said. “I am comfortable in both cultures, in both languages, in both worlds, and that helps. And that's what I would like for the Arab world, for children from a very early age to start appreciating other cultures, to start understanding there is richness in our diversity. Yes, there is a movement of Islamic conservatism and it is on the rise. But women have earned rights and it is now up to them to defend them.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS