In the 1950s, the government started giving extra points to students of indigenous heritage to ensure they would have opportunities for education. The fairness and necessity of this policy has often been questioned.
As exams such as the General Scholastic Ability Test and the Basic Competence Test for Junior High School Students purportedly emphasize fairness, the system of extra points seems flawed.
Each year, people write articles criticizing the policy, which fuels ethnic tension.
Giving indigenous students extra points but no complimentary educational measures is like giving a stimulant to a sick patient: After first feeling invigorated, he or she slips back into the same state once the effect wears off.
Later in their schooling, indigenous students who have had lower results often experience a lack of confidence, high stress and difficulty adjusting to their school environment, sometimes leading them to drop out.
“Benefits” is a beautiful description for a system that is essentially a form of educational welfare. It is not education, however, the goal of which is to increase a student’s abilities. Regardless of how many extra points are doled out — be it the current 25 percent or even 100 percent — it will not improve the academic abilities of students.
Research by Kao Shu-fang (高淑芳) shows that the academic performance of indigenous students remains below that of other students in languages, math and sciences, even when an additional 20 percent to 127 percent of their original score is tacked on.
Would indigenous students do better if teachers had a better idea of cultural diversity and could teach according to a student’s capabilities and needs? What would the average performance of indigenous students be if they were given individual tutoring and counseling after entering a school with lower scores thanks to extra points?
Educational content must, after an assessment, be designed to fit the abilities of gifted students, such as in the Individualized Education Program. Yet in the case of indigenous students who lag behind, boosting their scores is seen as a adequate to solve all problems. This is preposterous.
The problem of lower scores among indigenous students has been around for decades, yet the Ministry of Education has not come up with any solutions.
There are two possible reasons for this. The first is that there are no indigenous senior officials at the ministry and so it does not understand the importance of this issue. Secondly, those in charge of indigenous education might not know what to do. Who is in charge of education of indigenous students at the ministry, how much is spent on indigenous education annually and what are the ministry’s policies?
The gaps in education levels between indigenous and Han students have widened over the decades. Dropout rates among indigenous students are eight times that of other students, surveys indicate, and the graduation rate is only one-sixth that of other university students.
The potential and skills of our children, regardless of their ethnicity, are a precious asset. Every child should receive education suited to their abilities and cultural diversity should be respected.
Educational authorities should release a white paper on this subject and consider proposing amendments to the law, establishing an indigenous education unit and organizing a conference on the subject.
It is high time there was a change in the situation.
Pan Yu-fong is an associate professor at the Department of Special Education at National Taiwan Normal University and secretary of the Taiwan Indigenous Professor Society.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON AND TED YANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US