I was born in 1947, the year of the 228 Incident. In those days of silent disappearances and killings, my pregnant mother had to climb over walls just to visit the doctor for a check-up.
One story I often heard as a child was the public execution of Pingtung Assembly Council deputy speaker Yeh Chiu-mu (葉秋木). After shooting him, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) did not allow his family to collect his body, which was left on display for three days to intimidate the public. Having heard such stories since childhood, I felt strong sympathy for the victims and their families.
As Pingtung County commissioner, I submitted a special budget, which was approved by the county council, to erect Taiwan’s first officially sponsored 228 memorial. Later, as premier, I approved an order for flags throughout Taiwan to be flown at half-mast on Feb. 28.
I allocated NT$1.5 billion (US$43 million) over five years so the 228 Memorial Foundation could do its work, and commissioned the Report on Responsibility for the 228 Incident.
A building on Nanhai Road in Taipei that once housed the Taiwan Provincial Assembly Council was chosen for the new National 228 Memorial Museum. We allocated a generous budget for refurbishing the building, and the museum was inaugurated on the 60th anniversary of the 228 Incident. That day, a stamp was released with the image of the museum — the first stamp to bear the words “Taiwan Post.”
As someone who was born in 1947, who moved from the south to the north and then went from county commissioner to premier, I saw the truth about the 228 Incident gradually come to light. I was gratified to see Taiwan gradually face its history. It is better to deal with the past honestly, and I sincerely hoped that Taiwan could get over the scars of history and look forward to a brighter future.
Before he was elected president, Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) often took part in 228 memorial events, visited relatives of victims and bowed his head in mourning at the graves of those who died. He admitted the KMT was at fault and apologized on the party’s behalf. He wrote articles and made speeches in Hoklo, saying he was deeply pained about the events of 1947 and that they would remain forever engraved in his heart.
He twice voiced his approval for establishing the 228 Memorial Museum, and when I ordered flags to be flown at half-mast on 228 Memorial Day, he approved and said it would be reasonable to treat the anniversary as a national day of mourning.
Many said Ma was putting on a show to win support for his election bid, but I preferred to take his words at face value.
Although the KMT treated Taiwan and its people brutally, the kind-hearted Taiwanese have chosen to forgive and put their trust in the party. But what have they got in return?
Just 23 days into Ma’s presidency, the Ministry of Education ordered the 228 Memorial Foundation to remove a 228 Incident exhibition from the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall. Earlier this year, the KMT legislative caucus annulled the budgets for the 228 Memorial Foundation and construction of the 228 Memorial Museum. Work on the museum was halted even before that, and remains in limbo.
Just days ago, Ma’s protege, KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇), suggested in his bill on memorial days and festivals that Feb. 28 should be a day of remembrance, but not a holiday.
I call upon President Ma to undo the hurtful things that have been done since he took office. This would comfort the families of victims, assuage anger and help unite everyone in Taiwan as a people with a common fate.
Doing so would not just point to Ma’s personal credibility; it is his responsibility and duty as head of state.
Su Tseng-chang is a former premier.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS