THE VALUE OF the New Taiwan (NT) dollar has fallen repeatedly in recent days. Coming at this particular time, can the NT dollar’s devaluation help boost Taiwan’s exports and remedy the country’s economic downturn? This is a pertinent question that merits discussion.
Domestic demand has been slack since 2000. Over the past five years, private consumption and investment have grown at an average of just 1.84 percent and 3.52 percent per year respectively. During the same period, however, overseas demand for Taiwan’s exports has performed better, growing by an annual average of 8.94 percent, thanks to which the economy has grown by an average of 4.5 percent each year over the past five years.
However, the financial tsunami of the third quarter of last year has spread around the globe and made its influence felt in the real economy. The squeeze on credit has cut effective demand below what is needed, with a strong negative effect on the global economy as demand from the US, Europe and other advanced economies for goods made in developing countries falls. Taiwan is a clear example, its exports having plunged 3.68 percent in the fourth quarter of last year.
Exports were the last remaining engine driving Taiwan’s economic growth, but now that engine has stalled. As calls for salvaging the economy get louder, some people hope that the devaluation of recent days will help by boosting exports.
Economic theory tells us that, under suitable conditions (the so-called Marshall-Lerner condition), devaluation can indeed boost exports and improve the balance of trade in the long term. In the short term, however, it will produce what is known as the J-curve effect, meaning that exports will dip before they rise. To begin with, the volume effect outweighs the price effect, actually causing a fall in net exports following devaluation.
In the short term, then, devaluation is not effective in boosting exports. In practice, whether devaluation will have the benefit of revitalizing Taiwan’s depressed economy needs to be further considered in terms of supply and demand.
Regarding the demand side, the current fall in exports is caused by the drop in demand abroad, which in turn is caused by the credit crunch, because when people and companies can’t get credit, their purchasing power falls. In such a situation, although devaluation produces a relative fall in export prices, this will not necessarily lure overseas buyers to purchase more goods exported from Taiwan. In other words, the effect of falling incomes may outweigh that of falling prices.
From the supply side point of view, currency devaluation will cause a relative rise in the prices of imported raw materials, and therefore in production costs. It will cause domestic prices to rise, which clearly will not encourage domestic consumption. Therefore, it can only cause Taiwan’s already flagging domestic consumption to go from bad to worse.
Furthermore, devaluation will cause a rise in the price of imported machinery, which is not good for domestic investment. Besides, as economies in East Asia are moving toward integration, intra-industry trade is increasing rapidly, and incoming materials processing and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) production are commonplace.
Under such conditions, as currency devaluation causes import costs to rise and export prices to fall, value added in these modes of production will be reduced, and so will manufacturers’ profit margins. This will make it hard for manufacturers to keep going, and will even cause some export-oriented manufacturers in Taiwan to go under, which will in turn cost more people their jobs.
More importantly, when the market anticipates currency devaluation, the result will be capital flight and reluctance of overseas capital to invest in Taiwan. It will have a negative impact on domestic investment and the stock market. When the market loses confidence in the NT dollar, demand for foreign currency will increase and the domestic money supply will plunge, causing credit to be tightened even further, with a negative impact on private consumption and investment. Worst of all, Taiwan’s foreign reserves will start to fall, even to the extent of causing a currency crisis. One need only look to the Asian financial crisis of 1997 to 1998 to see what might happen.
Devaluation does have some benefits. For example, it makes imported consumer products more expensive relative to those produced at home, which is good for Taiwanese manufacturers serving the domestic market. The problem is that such products are generally consumer durables or luxury goods, whose prices are relatively elastic. In times of economic depression, demand for such goods is usually low, so their influence is limited.
Currency devaluation can also attract overseas tourists to visit Taiwan and buy things here. Unfortunately, now that the whole world is sinking into recession, hopes that devaluation will attract more visitors, thereby boosting demand in the domestic tourism sector are probably misplaced.
Currency devaluation has the ability to stimulate exports and revive the economy. Its disadvantages outweigh its benefits. The idea that we can pin our hopes for recovery on devaluation is, to say the least, debatable.
Chuang Yih-chyi is a professor of economics at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers