While the financial crisis continues to take its toll and unemployment rises, the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has failed to work out concrete countermeasures. Obviously, the government lacks a vision for Taiwan and has never thought of using the economic crisis as a chance to thoroughly change the fundamental structure of Taiwanese society and push for social transformation.
Social transformation is not merely a matter of economic or industrial change. Although industrial transformation is important given the nation’s situation, solutions depend not only on infrastructure, effective manpower, social connections, creativity and imagination. A culture of respect, trust and cooperation as well as civilized behavior are also key to a successful transformation. How to refine services throughout society and build a service society is key to developing a high-quality humane society.
By “service society” I mean a society that provides commercial and non-commercial services, including educational, social, medical, cultural and environmental services.
The government should use the opportunity offered by the unemployment situation to extensively increase manpower for the aforementioned non-commercial services so that these services can be further developed and refined, which could lead people to treat one another in a more civilized and humane manner. This would also give us the ability to create a better cultural and ecological environment.
Educational services provide a good example. From kindergarten through high school, students are taught in large-size classes. A teacher with a class of between 40 and 50 students cannot engage in meaningful interaction with each student. But education is intrinsically a very personal service. As students have different talents and interests, a good teacher should provide each student with guidance and assistance based on their individual aptitude. Only then can students develop their own identities, interests and skills to achieve self-realization. This is the basis of high-quality societies as well as a fundamental educational principle. However, large-sized classes have had a severe negative impact on the quality of education and manpower in Taiwan.
The decreasing birth rate could have reduced class sizes, but educational authorities appear to have failed to recognize the serious problem posed by large-size classes and decided instead to reduce the number of classes rather than the number of students. As a result, class sizes cannot be reduced, nor can education be personalized. In particular, with unemployment on the rise, the measures proposed by the educational authorities are only aimed at improving hardware or increasing the number of temporary teachers without addressing the real issue and trying to change the entire educational structure. It is a great pity. I estimate that at least 80,000 more teachers would be needed for kindergarten through 12th grade education before it could meet the educational quality standards of advanced countries.
As far as social services are concerned, rapid social change is causing the disintegration of the extended family and increasing poverty. The government must actively extend help. But Taiwan’s social security system is incomplete.
There is such a shortage of social workers, various social relief measures and medical personnel — especially nurses — that the quality of social services cannot be improved. When the disadvantaged are not given proper respect and their dignity is trampled, the humane qualities of society immediately decline and social relations gradually become distorted. The government needs to greatly increase various social services and manpower to improve the situation.
At last, cultural and environmental services also deserve attention. During the Great Depression in the 1930s, the government of then-US president Franklin Roosevelt hired a large number of personnel for cultural and historical services. This not only expanded domestic demand, but also managed to preserve a great deal of valuable cultural and historical information.
In Taiwan, there are many passionate and talented people who have lots of ideas about how to improve local culture and public affairs. The government should provide these people with the resources they need so they can take the initiative to start a range of cultural ventures or services and in turn improve local cultural standards.
The service industry made up 71 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, but only used 58 percent of Taiwan’s labor force. This shows that Taiwan is short of manpower in the service industry, which also explains why the quality of services has not improved.
Service is a mutual interaction between people as opposed to treating people as a “product.” Hopefully the Ma administration will take advantage of the opportunity to fundamentally change the service structure of Taiwanese society and make Taiwan a service-based country.
Lii Ding-tzann is a professor at National Tsing Hua University’s Institute of Sociology.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers