Few places in the world offer as daunting a set of challenges as South Asia. A narcotics-fueled insurgency threatens newly democratic Afghanistan, a resurgent Taliban in its tribal areas has destabilized Pakistan and The recent carnage in Mumbai has prompted another standoff between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.
Each of these crises calls for urgent action. But as a new Asia Society task force argues, in tackling them the world must not lose sight of the great promise of the India-US relationship.
Today, both countries stand on the brink of an historic opportunity: a new international relationship that will foster global security, stronger economies, nuclear nonproliferation and progress in combating climate change. But these potential gains will be realized only if US President Barack Obama gives India the attention it deserves and if both countries broaden the strategic stake by involving their private sectors in issues that governments alone cannot resolve.
Already, the end of the Cold War and painstaking diplomacy have brought the US-India relationship to a point unimaginable just ten years ago. Both governments now understand each other better and the two countries’ interests are more aligned than they have ever been.
The US presence in Afghanistan highlights the need for stability in South Asia. India’s democracy and burgeoning economy make it a major factor in the Asian balance of power, and the recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai underscore a shared struggle against violent Islamic extremism.
The recent civil nuclear agreement between the two countries paves the way for cooperation in halting the spread of nuclear weapons. At the same time, bilateral trade has soared to more than US$40 billion last year, from about US$12 billion in 1998.
Even where the two governments continue to disagree — for example, on the Doha round of trade negotiations and on the solution to climate change — the potential for new and creative cooperation outweighs their differences.
To begin with security, India is a vital piece of the puzzle on questions of stability in Afghanistan and the balance of power in Asia. On global nonproliferation, the US should push for a role for India in next year’s Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) review conference in order to complete the country’s transformation from being part of the problem to being part of the solution. In terms of counter-terrorism, the tragic events in Mumbai present an opportunity to ratchet up intelligence sharing, joint response training and personnel exchanges to defeat the defining threat of our times.
Over the past decade, economics has pulled the US and India closer. It will continue to power the relationship in the future, even as both countries experience a slowdown during the current economic crisis. The US should tap India’s potential as an engine for economic recovery and consult much more closely with it on matters of finance, trade and investment. In the long run, a global trade agreement will not be completed without India’s engagement. By getting India into the G8 and other multilateral institutions, the US can ensure that India’s growing role in the world carries commensurate responsibilities.
Beyond government cooperation, the creativity and dynamism of businesses, non-governmental organizations and private citizens in both countries hold the key to what India and the US can offer each other and the world. Obama should tap the expertise and energy in the Indian and American private sectors to foster public-private partnerships on complex global problems such as climate change, agricultural transformation, education and HIV/AIDS.
Consider climate change. Without India, it is hard to imagine a successful conclusion to the 2009 Copenhagen conference to draft a successor agreement to the Kyoto Protocol. Reaching an agreement will require tough diplomacy, difficult compromises, technological innovation and changes to our carbon-intensive way of life.
India and the US are natural partners in meeting this challenge, with innovative scientists and venture capitalists who can take technology breakthroughs from the lab to the market, and NGOs with vast grassroots conservation and public advocacy experience. Similar coalitions can be assembled to dent global poverty by fostering a second green revolution in Indian agriculture, to enhance India’s role in the global economy through vocational and higher education and to tackle the worldwide spread of AIDS.
For too long, the world’s oldest and largest democracies have failed to fulfill the promise of their relationship. But if Obama seizes what we believe is a rare historic opportunity, this could change decisively — for the long-term benefit of the US, India and the world.
Frank Wisner was US ambassador to India from 1994 to 1997; Charles Kaye is former chairman of the US-India Business Council and chairman of the Asia Society; Vishakha Desai is president of the Asia Society; and Alyssa Ayres is director for India and South Asia at McLarty Associates.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS