Ann Daniels, 44, polar explorer, is about to trek 1,200km to the geographic North Pole. By the time she arrives, she will have dragged a 52kg sledge for 100 days and put up with great hardship: temperatures of minus 52ºC, plunging into Arctic waters, no luxuries, dehydrated food, a cup, spoon, pencil and a diary. She won’t even be able to wash or change her clothes for more than three months. But there is one thing she won’t sacrifice: phone calls to her children — triplets Lucy, Joseph and Rachel, 14, and five-year-old Sarah.
“The phone is really for operational purposes,” she said, “but if they [the team] want me to perform, I just have to use it for the family. Going on past experience, I’m fine for about three weeks, then I start to pine and am really unhappy, so I get on the phone. They never really want to know what I’m up to. They just want to tell me what they’ve been doing. Then I’ve had my fix and I’m OK again.”
Daniels has been to the North Pole six times, but the Catlin Arctic Survey is her first scientific expedition. Led by Pen Hadow, the polar explorer, its aim is to measure the rate at which the polar ice cap is melting.
“Ann’s as tough as you like,” said Hadow, who describes her as immensely grounded and cool under pressure. “She is the best woman explorer in the world.”
We meet at her village home in Devon where she lives with her partner, Tom O’Connor, an aircraft engineer who is on nights and asleep upstairs.
Sarah, her youngest, is milling around eating her mother’s expedition rations of chocolate chips — you can’t take bars of chocolate into the Arctic, Daniels said, as she pulls her daughter close, because the chocolate gets so frozen it would break your teeth.
Outside there is heavy snow, and Daniels’s parents, who “move in for every expedition and take over my life,” are dressed in heavy knits and scarves, but Daniels is wearing a light jumper because by her standards this cold is close to tropical. Inside, there’s a play-school atmosphere — bits of paper and glass beads on the kitchen table — mother/daughter art-project bonding before she leaves in five days.
“The children are a barometer for me,” she said. “I always think, I’ve got to come home. So I don’t take stupid risks.”
Not that everyone agrees. There are plenty who say mothers shouldn’t leave their children to do something so dangerous. She went on a TV chatshow in the late 1990s “knowing the whole show would slag me off. I was the mother from hell.”
But one woman stood up and said she admired her personal ambition. Still, she is disappointed by how little attitudes have shifted since Alison Hargreaves, the mother and climber, was killed on an expedition to K2 in 1995.
“That was more than 13 years ago and I’m still being hit with her name,” she cried. “How many other mothers have died in that time on motorways, and in work environments, whether they be policewomen or nurses or cleaners. Nobody ever mentions them. It’s always Alison Hargreaves doing her job.”
“She does have a harder time from society,” said Hadow, who has two children, “much harder than me.”
Daniels’s children, for their part, are sanguine.
“It just feels ordinary because she’s my mum,” said Joseph, when I ask him what it’s like having a mother with two frostbitten toes.
Plus, he rather likes the routine: “She doesn’t work every day. She stays home for, like, a couple of years and then goes away in one chunk.”
He says they will follow her progress by sticking pins in a map and he’s looking forward to his present: snow from the North Pole.
“Mum puts it in bottles and brings it back,” he said, “but the problem is, it melts.”
His only difficulty with her job is how to explain it:
“When people ask, I say she’s a walker. I don’t know how else to describe it,” he said.
Daniels is a firm leader through the frozen unknown and yet for years she never left her hometown of Bradford in northern England. Her father was a door-to-door insurance salesman, her mother was a secretary for a large company. Growing up, she was a tomboy with four older brothers.
“My poor father wanted a girl but then one pops up who is into climbing trees and running around and watching football and rugby,” she said.
She thrived at school and was the only one in her family to pass any exams — “but university was never an option in my family,” so she focused on “doing the right thing”.
She got married, aged 21, and worked as an office junior for NatWest bank, rising through the ranks to assistant branch manager. In 1994, she went on maternity leave — she had had fertility problems and opted for IVF — planning to return to middle management. But having triplets changed everything.
“Everyone said, ‘You won’t cope, here’s my number, ask for help, don’t feel a failure,’ and I thought, ‘I damn well will cope,’” she said.
She didn’t just discover enormous resolve through her children. They also up-ended all her ideas of a conventional life.
“I’d left the safe bank and what was expected of me, had three children rather than one and was having a great time. I thought, there’s a big world out there,” she said.
The breakthrough came in 1995, when her husband showed her a newspaper advertisement asking for volunteers for the McVitie’s Penguin Polar Team Relay to the North Pole. More than 300 women applied and they all gathered for SAS-type trials. Daniels ended the day in tears.
“I was so outclassed. They were all hardy outdoor types who had climbed Kilimanjaro in a weekend. But they told us to come back in nine months for four more days and that’s when they would pick the team,” she said.
So while her babies slept, she did push-ups in the garden, skipping, running, anything to increase her fitness. When they announced the team at the end of the trials she wept again, but this time with happiness.
“That was when I fell in love with the Arctic Ocean and expedition life,” she said. “It blew my mind. Before that, my sum total experience of nature was two weeks outdoor training.”
Life moved quickly on her return. She was part of the first all-women’s team to ski to the North and South poles between 1998 and 2002. She also tried to ski solo to the North Pole in 2005 but had to abandon the attempt due to permit problems. Her marriage broke down when the children were three. She met O’Connor in 2001, and had Sarah two years later, but providing for her children is a big drive. Consequently, she took on a day job as a motivational speaker, and uses such phrases as: “You have to put the pain in the box.”
Daniels’s job on the expedition is to cook, which sounds easy, but isn’t.
“In the morning, it’s minus 45ºC and you’ve got to get out your sleeping bag to light the cooker. You can’t speak because your brain slows down and you are just so cold. You tense every muscle,” she said.
Her routine is making tea and coffee, plus dehydrated porridge, then melting enough snow to fill flasks with the six liters of water they will need for the day. This takes three hours, which is why Daniels will get up at 3am. They plan to trek in 75-minute bursts, with five-minute breaks, when they eat chocolate chips, nuts and biscuits. The biggest challenge — apart from the polar bears, storms, frostbite and hypothermia — is eating enough.
“We have to get in 6,000 calories and we still lose weight,” she said. “By the time I come back I expect to be a goddess!”
Dinner is dehydrated chicken curry and rice or beef and potato stew.
The lack of terra firma, it becomes clear, is what makes the North Pole so testing.
“The ice moves, breaks up, and you can be in danger of being mangled, crushed up with the ice as it shifts,” she said.
The South Pole is much easier, she said, because it’s just an endless flat white wasteland.
So why does she do it? It’s not for solo self-advancement, that’s for sure.
“She’s not about strutting her stuff,” Hadow said.
My guess is that her reports of cracking ice, sensory deprivation and howling wind are partly about conquest and moral determination — “It’s the challenge and not only coming out of it, but being able to deal with it and deal with it well” — but also about something far more primitive.
“Yes, it’s cold, yes it’s terrible, yes it’s painful,” she said, “but actually it’s nature at its best and it’s huge and it makes you realize just how small you are — how humble, how insignificant.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers