Taiwan is a country, and it thirsts to become a normal and advanced democracy, regardless of what its national title may be. Such a national consciousness is the common aspiration of most people in Taiwan.
Faced with the Chinese Communist Party’s “one China” united front strategy, which is echoed by pro-unification forces within Taiwan, people may differ on how to achieve this aspiration, even to the extent of serious disputes and confrontation. Some go so far as demanding that others unite around their particular opinion and denigrating those who decline to do so.
Such an attitude not only oppresses others right to free expression, but also weakens the movement, raising the specter of Taiwan’s final defeat.
What is needed is a pragmatic and feasible fundamental principle that is acceptable to all.
As Taiwanese democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水) said, “Compatriots must unite, for unity is strength.”
Strengthening and expanding Taiwan’s national consciousness is the most basic way to prevent annexation by China. However, efforts to consolidate national consciousness can be legitimate and convincing only when they are associated with people or things that uphold justice and ethics.
So our fundamental principle is that “the words and deeds of any person or party should be tolerated, respected and supported as long as they uphold Taiwanese national consciousness and comply with justice and ethics. That is the way to attract the public to identify with Taiwan as a country.”
Within this scope, nobody should publicly attack or judge others based on their personal preferences, lest they create divisions that could be used by the pro-unification camp. Anyone who insists on doing so may be suspected of fomenting personal or factional struggles. Which way is best can be seen from the extent to which it extends the public’s identification with Taiwan as a country.
We should condemn any word and restrain any deed that runs against either Taiwan’s national consciousness or justice and ethics. After all, Taiwanese national identity is a natural and healthy concept, so there is no need to shy away from it.
Without Taiwanese national identity, justice and ethics are empty words, because if we do not safeguard Taiwan’s status the county will come under the sway of the communists. Such an outcome would endanger our freedom, democracy and human rights, as Taiwan would be amalgamated into China’s society — one in which wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few while the majority live in poverty. What could be more unjust and unethical than that?
If, on the other hand, people or things associated with Taiwanese national consciousness are seen to violate justice and ethics, they may easily be used to defame the whole idea and make it unpopular.
As US President Barack Obama said in his inaugural speech: “Our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.”
Taiwan’s cause is a just one, and ethical conduct is a forceful example. So if we can stick to the basic principles of Taiwanese national consciousness, justice and ethics, while treating others with due tolerance, humility and restraint, we can double and redouble our strength. As long as we work together, Taiwan will surely win out in the end.
Chang Shyue-yih is a professor in the School of Medicine at National Yang-Ming University and president of Taiwan Society North.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers