In a call to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) 10 days after his inauguration, US President Barack Obama promised cooperation between the two powerhouses and expressed hopes of building more constructive relations. Only by maintaining a positive and balanced relationship with the US and China can our government ensure that Taiwan’s best national interests are met.
In a briefing, the White House spokesperson said that although the two leaders discussed a wide range of issues, the main topic was the global financial crisis. China is the US government’s largest creditor and its economic strength and huge foreign exchange reserves have led the EU and the US to see China as the main guard against the financial tsunami. In their conversation, it was made clear that US-China relations are vital for both countries.
China plays a significant role in the US government’s economic and financial policies. However, there is a difference in how Obama and Hu protect their interests. While Obama stressed the need to correct global trade imbalances and stimulate economic growth and restore credit markets, Hu opposed trade and investment protectionism as ways of solving the crisis.
Although Obama expects the Chinese government to help stabilize the global economy with responsible policies, Hu, who is concerned about maintaining China’s steady economic growth, worries that US protectionism could make a comeback.
Relations between big countries are intricate. US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s remarks in a Senate confirmation hearing that China manipulates its currency drew harsh criticism from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce and angered Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), who told the World Economic Forum in Davos that the US was responsible for the global economic crisis. Even if the Obama administration includes experts in Chinese affairs, any slip in the handling of US-China relations can have an adverse impact.
How the US and China handle their economic and trade relations will also indirectly affect the prospects of Taiwanese businesspeople in China as well as the nation’s economic cooperation agreement with China.
Media have reported that Obama and Hu seemed to avoid discussing human rights, religion and Taiwan. This might lead pessimists to assume that the Obama administration will not pay sufficient attention to relations with Taiwan or stand up for US founding values, such as democracy and freedom.
But those concerned about Taiwan-US relations should keep two key points in mind. First, the US and China are big countries with global clout, and cross-strait issues are not always the primary concern in their complex web of relationships on the global, regional and bilateral level.
Second, Obama’s conversation with Hu focused on the most pressing issues between the two countries. Having Taiwan as a focal point of US-China relations for the past 13 years has not necessarily been a blessing for the Taiwanese public or the nation’s interests.
There is now an opportunity for a thaw in cross-strait relations, and this also sets the conditions for restoring mutual trust in Taiwan-US relations. Taiwan’s government and opposition should prioritize the interests and well-being of the public and strive for sustainable economic development to create a healthy, win-win-win situation for the US, China and Taiwan early in Obama’s presidency.
Alexander Huang is an assistant professor in the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry