After weeks of insisting she could prove the US State Department wrong, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Diane Lee (李慶安) declined to show her cards on Saturday. Her reason? She no longer holds a public post.
Lee’s lawyer announced on Saturday, as her supporters and critics alike waited with baited breath, that Lee would not go public with a document she said the State Department was still reviewing and that she claimed would prove she not a US citizen.
The argument would seem to be that as she was no longer a legislator, the public no longer had a right to know whether Lee had been breaking the law — and illegally collecting a government salary — for the past 14 years.
Saturday marked a year since the start of Lee’s most recent legislative term, and in line with a clause in the Nationality Act (國籍法) stipulating that a legislator should prove a second nationality has been renounced within a year of taking office, Lee had vowed to produce documentation to support her claims.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and others had stood by that deadline, allowing Lee more than a month after a letter from the State Department identifying her as a US citizen was made public by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮).
That grace period was a gesture many felt constituted preferential treatment by the KMT of a legislator already in her fourth term.
But not everyone has been satisfied by Lee’s attempt to withdraw from public scrutiny, including some KMT lawmakers who are aware of the potential impact of the scandal — and the caucus’ response to it — on the party’s reputation. Days after the State Department’s response was disclosed, KMT legislators voted down a DPP proposal that the Legislative Yuan examine Lee’s eligibility to retain her position.
More than a month later, after her resignation as a legislator, withdrawal from the party and continued failure to disprove the US State Department’s findings, the KMT can no longer afford to be seen as shielding Lee from public censure and potential legal penalties.
On Monday, KMT caucus secretary-general Chang Sho-wen (張碩文) said that although the legislature no longer had the power to unseat Lee or require that she present evidence of her claims, Lee should produce her proof as soon as possible.
As Lee quit her party just one day before she was to speak to its Evaluation and Discipline Committee, the KMT can no longer penalize her through that channel. Nevertheless, it needs to take a clear, if overdue, stance that Lee’s case must be followed through. If it fails to do so, allegations that Lee is enjoying the party’s protection will persist. This, at a time when concern is rife both at home and abroad that justice in Taiwan is rapidly becoming partisan.
Lee’s citizenship status was not just a matter of eligibility to stay in office. She has possibly been in violation of the law for more than a decade and, in accordance with the Nationality Act, would therefore be obliged to repay the salary she earned during those years. That sum, while unconfirmed, has been estimated at NT$120 million (US$3.3 million).
Whether or not Lee is a legislator now is irrelevant.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers