The Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, which is in charge of the Cabinet’s organizational reform, has said that a maritime council will be established to handle increasingly complex maritime affairs. The council will mainly consist of the Coast Guard Administration and will not include the Fisheries Agency. In short, fishery matters will not be its primary task. This differs from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) campaign promise to establish an ocean ministry and has caused some academics to pen articles showing their concern.
Global population growth, environmental pollution and disappearing resources mean that in addition to tourism, shipping, national defense and commercial activities, oceans — which cover 71 percent of the Earth’s surface — have become a vital source of food and energy. Attaining sustainable development of marine resources through integrated maritime management and international cooperation should therefore be one of the main tasks of a maritime agency. The current division of duties among different government agencies has made it difficult to draft maritime policies. A maritime agency should be a decision-making — rather than simply a coordinating — body.
The agency’s status in the government hierarchy must reflect the importance of the ocean to the nation’s general development. One example is Japan, whose national development is closely aligned with the ocean. About 40 percent of animal protein ingested by Japanese comes from marine products, and 99 percent of its trade depends on sea transport.
The living environment in Japan has increasingly been under threat from a worsening ocean environment, a low energy self-sufficiency rate, shrinking marine resources, potential threats to maritime transport lines and natural disasters. Moreover, disputes over oil exploration in the East China Sea with China, South Korea and Russia and the issue of delimiting exclusive economic zones have prompted strong public calls that the government strengthen its maritime power.
A thorough examination showed that Japan’s maritime strategy was weak because policy management was fragmented given the large number of government agencies involved. To solve this problem, Tokyo drew up a Basic Ocean Law and formulated a Basic Plan for the Ocean. It set up a Headquarters for Comprehensive Ocean Policy headed by the prime minister and appointed an ocean policy minister to formulate and implement cross-ministry maritime policies, including the use and preservation of fisheries and marine resources, protection of territorial waters and enforcement of marine security. These measures, designed to streamline, strengthen and integrate maritime policies, show Japan’s determination to become a modern maritime state.
Policy developments in the EU have a different emphasis, stressing that for humankind to handle its relations with the sea it is necessary to develop innovative maritime industries and encouraging policymakers to take an innovative approach. Instead of just thinking how they could exploit the seas, they need to view the ocean as an organic whole, and all members must employ a far-sighted vision in formulating new maritime policies.
In Taiwan, the government has always had a rather shallow understanding of maritime affairs, and talk of building a maritime state has been little more than a political totem. Bureaucrats are more concerned with their own status and prospects for promotion. Unless there is a shake-up in the system, laws and mindset, it does not matter whether we set up a “maritime council” or an “ocean ministry,” Taiwan will be an island nation, but it will remain a long way from being a maritime nation.
Du Yu is the chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG AND JULIAN CLEGG
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Saturday is the day of the first batch of recall votes primarily targeting lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The scale of the recall drive far outstrips the expectations from when the idea was mooted in January by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘). The mass recall effort is reminiscent of the Sunflower movement protests against the then-KMT government’s non-transparent attempts to push through a controversial cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014. That movement, initiated by students, civic groups and non-governmental organizations, included student-led protesters occupying the main legislative chamber for three weeks. The two movements are linked
RSS