Ministry of Education data provided to legislators show that more than 20,000 college and university students, including students in school-to-work programs, suspended their studies in the last fall semester. This is more than in either of the 2006 or 2007 academic years.
The main reason for this increase was that the students were forced to enter the workplace because their parents couldn’t afford their tuition fees because of recent employee and salary reductions.
A lot of people do not know that if the government were to allocate an extra NT$450 million (US$13.5 million) to education annually, it could pay the interest on student loans for 750,000 students. If the government were to spend an extra NT$2 billion, it could reduce tuition fees for private schools and more than 10,000 students would not have had to discontinue their education last semester.
This is not only a personal loss, but also damages the nation’s competitiveness.
Nor do those who choose to stay in school have an easy time of it. A recent survey conducted by 1111 Job Bank showed that the average college student works 18.3 hours a week, which is very close to their average of 18.5 hours of classes.
At a meeting of the Alliance of Angry Youths, which is composed of college students and members of the Taiwan Youth Public Affairs and other organizations, it was said that over 70 percent of college students have part-time jobs, citing a MiniJob survey announced in September.
What’s more, Taiwanese higher education has moved toward corporatization. There are nearly 1 million college and graduate students in Taiwan, 60 percent of whom go to private schools. In order to pay tuition — which is much higher than at public schools — and increased living expenses, they have to work part time, which in turn has an impact on the quality of their education.
Despite the fact that college students and their parents are under great pressure, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration still offered a subsidy of NT$80 billion each year to cover the 18 percent preferential interest rate on public servants’ retirement funds.
In addition, the government spent about NT$8 billion on its shortsighted scheme to issue consumer vouchers to all Taiwanese citizens regardless of whether they are rich or poor. It is uncertain if they can be used to pay for tuition fees.
The government also spent NT$57.3 billion in an attempt to expand domestic consumption, although who knows where the money went? It could well have been aimed at consolidating grassroots support used to build the museum to Ma’s honor.
Who cares about the plight of students who have had to suspend their studies? Ma certainly hasn’t initiated any measures to help out students financially. Why can’t the government spare some money to help relieve the financial difficulties of students? What future do they have?
As for the 18 percent interest rate, the government could have used that money to freeze university tuition fees for 10 years or offer subsidies to all students, so they could enjoy the same privileges as the children of military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers.
The government could also have offered full scholarships for the more than half of all college students that are not the children of military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers. These are all measures that could be carried out immediately, with immediate effects.
But will the government do it?
Tseng Tsung-kai is a member of the Alliance of Angry Youths and a graduate student at Culture University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past