White tigers not conservation
Tigers are under severe threat through loss of habitat and poaching to supply an illicit trade in animal parts.
We are lucky in that there are six tiger sub-species still surviving. These are the Bengal tiger, the Amur tiger, the South China tiger, the Indochinese tiger, the Sumatran tiger and the Malayan tiger.
Sadly, in my lifetime we have lost the Javan tiger, the Bali tiger and the Caspian tiger.
None of these tigers were a “white” species. There is no species or sub-species of white tiger!
Today people are much more aware of the threats that tigers are facing and more is being done to protect them in the wild. The South China tiger is just hanging on in the wild, and with luck may well be saved.
Zoos today offer the tigers their best hope of survival with scientifically managed breeding programs. These will ensure that we have captive animals for many years to come.
White tigers are not rare! White tigers are not endangered! White tigers are not a species! They are not even a sub-species! White tigers have no conservation value.
The white tiger is a mutant, a freak of nature, an aberration of the Bengal tiger. They do occur in the wild, but only rarely. There are a number of records of animals being hunted and shot over the past 100 years or so. Left to their own in the wild they could possibly survive, but they would be disadvantaged by their color. Their prey would see them coming!
There are no white tigers in the wild today. The captive white tiger population has been deliberately “manufactured” by man. There is a huge population consisting of hundreds of unmanaged white tigers in Texas and China alone.
Keeping animals in captivity today revolves around breeding programs and conservation. It is a long-term project involving cooperation between reputable zoos the world over. The aim is to have strong, genetically viable populations for release into the wild at some point in the future.
No responsible zoo should be breeding white tigers. The space taken up by white tigers in captivity could be utilized for keeping and breeding other tiger species which are in desperate need.
PETER DICKINSON
Chester, UK
Masses voted in Trojan horse
The people of Taiwan were mobilized or manipulated by the media to vote for a leader who was intended to warm the relationship with China in a way that the US and China both felt comfortable with.
Lately, the US has differing opinions about this matter, while China is benefiting greatly from cross-strait agreements.
Without the media, the people would not have chosen to vote for pro-economy President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) instead of Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), who was “cynical” about the economy.
Like most other people who were skeptical about Ma’s so-called “6-3-3” policy, Hsieh knew in the first quarter of last year that the economic crisis was about to hit Taiwan.
A major factor that contributed to Ma’s landslide win was that the media unleashed the scandal surrounding former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in a timely manner and allowed it to be exploited to an extent that people associated Hsieh with Chen.
Now it appears that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is controlling the judges and the courts in indicting Chen and numerous other DPP members, while defending their own members whenever they are accused. Is that called fair justice?
Meanwhile, Ma continues to manipulate the people by asserting Taiwan’s sovereignty while accepting pandas from China whose names mean “unification” and endorsing financial, economic and eventual military cooperation in which Beijing has the upper hand.
Finally, control of the security apparatus was evident during Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin’s (陳雲林) visit, when innocent demonstrators were injustly treated by the police.
As someone who spent most of his life in Europe and the US, there is a noticeable difference in Taiwan under the rule of Ma.
ALEX RAYMOND
Niaosong, Taiwan
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers